You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today
- Thread starter seasideheights
- Start date
Quote from TPCS:
We are part of Main Street. Nobody will give us bailouts if we lose money. We don't have lobbyists to push for laws in our favor. And if we decide to leave trading nobody will offer us a job at the top of some government agency. We just happen to earn a living from the markets but we're in the same boat as everyone else on Main Street.
Yes, I know. Unfortunately, most people do not.
Quote from timcar:
Hopefully Congress will pass that Traders Tax this year 2010.
If they do just imagine how much those Algorithmic programs and High Frequency Traders will pay. With all that fast trading those guys do, the tax they will pay should pay for the War.
The SEC is set to address High Frequency Trading in 2010 through possible rule changes for those strategies deemed to be "unfair" or unlawful.
It doesn't need to be handled through taxation.
If it is, then you will have to pay the tax as well. Do you mind paying $271 every time you buy & later sell 1,000 shares of Walmart? If not, then send 1/4% of the total value of all of your buys & sells of stock for 2009 to the US Treasury. You can easily find this figure on the 2009 tax return that you will be filling out.
I found a list: http://www.aggdata.com/political/us-representatives.Quote from hippie:
Is there a list of emails, phone & fax numbers for these committee members?
There's a problem:
Part of the "proceeds" of H.R. 4191 are earmarked for the Surface Transportation Authorization Act (H.R. 3617), which has already passed the House. The reason, of course, is that DeFazio is one of the co-sponsors of this so he wants to have a source of funds for his pet project. The problem stems from the fact that Charles Rangel is another co-sponsor of H.R. 3617. He happens to be Chair of the Ways and Means Committee (one of the key committees overseeing H.R. 4191). This means that Rangel may actually want H.R. 4191 to pass in order to pay for H.R. 3617 and he has quite a bit of power to see that it gets through his committee.
Part of the "proceeds" of H.R. 4191 are earmarked for the Surface Transportation Authorization Act (H.R. 3617), which has already passed the House. The reason, of course, is that DeFazio is one of the co-sponsors of this so he wants to have a source of funds for his pet project. The problem stems from the fact that Charles Rangel is another co-sponsor of H.R. 3617. He happens to be Chair of the Ways and Means Committee (one of the key committees overseeing H.R. 4191). This means that Rangel may actually want H.R. 4191 to pass in order to pay for H.R. 3617 and he has quite a bit of power to see that it gets through his committee.
Quote from TPCS:
There's a problem:
Part of the "proceeds" of H.R. 4191 are earmarked for the Surface Transportation Authorization Act (H.R. 3617), which has already passed the House. The reason, of course, is that DeFazio is one of the co-sponsors of this so he wants to have a source of funds for his pet project. The problem stems from the fact that Charles Rangel is another co-sponsor of H.R. 3617. He happens to be Chair of the Ways and Means Committee (one of the key committees overseeing H.R. 4191). This means that Rangel may actually want H.R. 4191 to pass in order to pay for H.R. 3617 and he has quite a bit of power to see that it gets through his committee.
The funding for H.R. 3617 will obviously have to come from somewhere else, as it won't come from a transaction tax. Just because they earmark something as funding for a bill doesn't mean that the funding source will be there to use. There are many bills that get passed where they earmark the funding to come from a specific source, only to discover that the source they wanted to fund it with was not attainable. So basically, Defagio may get his bill H.R. 3167 passed, but the funds to pay for it will not come from H.R. 4191.
One minute Defagio and these idiot Democrats say the revenue funding from H.R. 4191 will be used strictly for budget deficit reduction, then to pay for health care, then for climate control/global warming, then to pay back main street, then to wipe their assholes, and now to help pay for pet projects like H.R. 3617. Defagio is so desperate to get H.R. 4191 passed, (which it won't), that he constantly changes the reasoning we need this tran. tax. I can only imagine that Defagio is sticking pins in his Obama voodoo doll because the White House is leaning towards levying fees on the banks, as opposed to a financial transaction tax. If the Obama White House get's it's way, and the fees are implemented on the banks, there is no way in hell a transaction tax would take place. With Geithner, Summers, and even Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, who has very deep ties to wall street, they obviously have a major say in whether something like this would take place.