1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Please add comments and email the editor at European Voice.com:-
evletters@europeanvoice.com

Please keep it polite but they need to hear our side of the story before steamrolling this tax through...

http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/fiscal-stimulus-withdrawal-and-a-tobin-tax/66729.aspx

Fiscal stimulus withdrawal and a Tobin tax By Peter O'Donnell
17.12.2009 / 04:41 CET
EU leaders had money on their minds at the summit.

Unsurprisingly, at the end of a year marked by profound financial and economic woes, EU leaders had money on their minds – and not just in relation to funding climate-change mitigation and adaptation.

They endorsed the common approach developed during the year to financial market supervision, both at the corporate and macroeconomic level, and they agreed on the need to co-ordinate the withdrawal, as of 2011, of fiscal stimulus measures introduced in response to the financial crisis.

‘Super-tax'

Specifically on the financial sector, the tone was set by UK and French announcements of a ‘super-tax' on bonuses paid out by banks rescued from the brink of collapse by EU member states. The UK's finance minister, Alistair Darling, revealed the day before the summit that a 50% tax would be imposed on end-of-year financial sector bonuses of over £25,000 (€27,600).

As the summit opened, French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced a similar measure, perhaps extending beyond the 2009 bonus season. German Chancellor Angela Merkel described the idea as “charming”, although impossible in her country “this year” because of “constitutional concerns”.

The Council more drily invited the financial sector to “implement sound compensation practices”. But the support in principle for the concept was also apparent in its emphasis on “renewing the economic and social contract between financial institutions and the society they serve”. Calling for the public to be “protected from risk”, it gave explicit encouragement to the consideration of insurance fees, resolution funds, contingent capital arrangements and even a global financial transaction levy.

Merkel openly backed the idea of an EU version of a ‘Tobin tax'. “We also need a transaction tax”, she said. Meanwhile, the European Commission and Swedish presidency of the EU announced that the EU is to explore setting up a financial transaction tax not just to provide for any future bail-outs of the banking sector, but also to support developing countries in their efforts to limit and adapt to climate change.

José Manuel Barroso, the president of the Commission, said that the Commission will look at a levy on “cross-border financial transactions” in a pending report on ‘innovative' financing methods to support developing countries. “If we want to help developing countries, we have to find additional sources of finance,” he said.
 
Quote from benwm:

Please add comments and email the editor at European Voice.com:-
evletters@europeanvoice.com

Please keep it polite but they need to hear our side of the story before steamrolling this tax through...

http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/fiscal-stimulus-withdrawal-and-a-tobin-tax/66729.aspx

Fiscal stimulus withdrawal and a Tobin tax By Peter O'Donnell
17.12.2009 / 04:41 CET
EU leaders had money on their minds at the summit.

Unsurprisingly, at the end of a year marked by profound financial and economic woes, EU leaders had money on their minds – and not just in relation to funding climate-change mitigation and adaptation.

They endorsed the common approach developed during the year to financial market supervision, both at the corporate and macroeconomic level, and they agreed on the need to co-ordinate the withdrawal, as of 2011, of fiscal stimulus measures introduced in response to the financial crisis.

‘Super-tax'

Specifically on the financial sector, the tone was set by UK and French announcements of a ‘super-tax' on bonuses paid out by banks rescued from the brink of collapse by EU member states. The UK's finance minister, Alistair Darling, revealed the day before the summit that a 50% tax would be imposed on end-of-year financial sector bonuses of over £25,000 (€27,600).

As the summit opened, French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced a similar measure, perhaps extending beyond the 2009 bonus season. German Chancellor Angela Merkel described the idea as “charming”, although impossible in her country “this year” because of “constitutional concerns”.

The Council more drily invited the financial sector to “implement sound compensation practices”. But the support in principle for the concept was also apparent in its emphasis on “renewing the economic and social contract between financial institutions and the society they serve”. Calling for the public to be “protected from risk”, it gave explicit encouragement to the consideration of insurance fees, resolution funds, contingent capital arrangements and even a global financial transaction levy.

Merkel openly backed the idea of an EU version of a ‘Tobin tax'. “We also need a transaction tax”, she said. Meanwhile, the European Commission and Swedish presidency of the EU announced that the EU is to explore setting up a financial transaction tax not just to provide for any future bail-outs of the banking sector, but also to support developing countries in their efforts to limit and adapt to climate change.

José Manuel Barroso, the president of the Commission, said that the Commission will look at a levy on “cross-border financial transactions” in a pending report on ‘innovative' financing methods to support developing countries. “If we want to help developing countries, we have to find additional sources of finance,” he said.



Here we go....... Like I said, were all fucked now!!! The transaction tax floodgate is about to burst open over this climate shit.
 
"The $100 billion annual fund endorsed by Clinton would help poorer countries switch to less environmentally harmful forms of energy production and prepare for the impacts of rising seas and warmer global temperatures. Clinton did not detail how much the U.S. would contribute to that fund. She said there were a number of financing options under consideration, but would not provide details."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/17/AR2009121700165.html?hpid=topnews
 
At long last the awakening. Copenhagen = global government = global taxes and red tape. And yes, we pay. :(

Obama arrives tomorrow and everything depends on him. Clinton always was pushing for this calling it a mater of national security.
 

Good line from the Merkel article:

"Consequently, implementing a new financial market tax in Germany would be unlikely during the current four-year parliamentary period."
 
Quote from drukes1234:

Seems like this has been a pretty good day for traders... let's keep fighting

That was yesterday. Today, something different. I can understand now what drives a person to develop manic depression.
 
Quote from cstfx:

That was yesterday. Today, something different. I can understand now what drives a person to develop manic depression.



This is sickening. It's not a matter of if now, but when. :(
 
Quote from cstfx:

Just came across the wire:

Clinton: US ready to join $100B climate aid fund

(AP) – 28 minutes ago

COPENHAGEN — U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has announced that the United States is prepared to join other rich countries in raising $100 billion in yearly climate financing for poor countries by 2020.

The announcement could give a boost to deadlocked climate talks which have faltered over disputes between rich and poor countries over emissions cuts and climate financing.

Clinton says that the financing is contingent on world leaders reaching a broader climate pact at the U.N. talks in Copenhagen.

She says the deal must include all major economies, meaningful actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions and a system to ensure all parties' actions are transparent.

Clinton says "$100 billion is a lot. It can have tangible effects."



Now we have to pay attention to how they are going to pay for it.

It sounds like this financing would be contigent on a lot of things falling into place. China seems to be a holdout (India as well) in that they don't want to be bound by specifics, etc. Hopefully they can't get an agreement so this $100 billion climate fund never happens.

In one of the other articles it mentioned the developing nations wanting $400-$500 billion annually by 2020 = WTF. Our finances are such a mess here in the US but we're going to ship all this money to poor countries? I don't think the country would ever go for that. The uproar would be huge...

-Guru
 
Back
Top