Quote from rsikit:
http://allafrica.com/stories/200912151055.html
Something to look for when Obama comes to town, the EU and Africa want some more taxes.
Quote from FightTheFuture:
Even Socialist Worker isn't enthused:
A Tobin Tax wonât solve the problem
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=19837

Quote from jksn922:
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=...ews/environment/copenhagen/article6958078.ece
If you read this article, it says Gordon Brown is running around at these meetings trying to get support from world leaders for the transaction tax. Obama is due at this meeting on Friday, and you can bet that Brown will be up his ass about it.
According to this story, the U.S. will be allowed to buy it's way out of adopting a more stringent target on cutting greenhouse gas emissions in a compromise bring brokered by Britain.
President Obama is unlikely to increase his previous offer on emissions when he joins the Copenhagen climate change summit on Friday. He will instead be expected to make a significant financial commitment to a global climate protection fund.
What would that significant financial commitment be? Hopefully, not agreeing to a global transaction tax. I am now worried sick.
Quote from rsikit:
They talk of all this legally binding stuff in Copenhagen, but it still needs to go thru legislation here in the US especially anytype of global levy.
Quote from jksn922:
Forgiving me ignorance here, but let's say Geithner agrees to a "global" transaction tax at the G-20, or Obama agrees to it at Copenhagen, would this proposal still have to pass the U.S. House and Senate, or could they be bypassed? If it still has to go through Congress, then I'm not too concerned about it, because it won't pass there, whether Geithner/Obama endorsed it or not.