Quote from Explorer:
The 50% tax is levied on the bank itself not the bonus recipient. The employee still gets the bonus but the bank is effectively fined for giving it.
Really? Thanks for pointing that out I didnt get that when I read it. Thats pretty crazy, maybe the banks wont give big bonues then. Your right I just found a better article that explains it: Her is an excerpt, it will be interesting to see which way banks choose.
Dec. 10 (Bloomberg) -- British Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darlingâs plan to levy a 50 percent tax on bonuses will make banks choose between punishing shareholders or employees.
Darling yesterday imposed the tax, to be paid by all banks operating in the U.K., on bonuses they pay employees until April 5. The measure, which the Treasury says will raise more than 550 million pounds ($890 million), will affect about 20,000 people.
Banks will have to decide whether to maintain payments to employees, allowing the additional tax expense to boost the cost of compensation and reduce profits for shareholders, or to protect profits by slashing bonuses. In some cases, firms may have to pay out bonuses because the terms have already been agreed with staff, said Jo Keddie, an employment lawyer at London-based Dawsons LLP.
âItâs a poison pill,â Keddie said in a telephone interview. âEither shareholders are going to take home less, or banks are going to have to punish their employees who have done very well,â she said. âItâs potentially shareholders that are going to lose out because many of the bonuses have already been agreed.â