1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Quote from rsikit:

This seems to be going downhill fast , now we got Pelosi basically say she sees a merit maybe supports this tax, the letter with 200 economists and the jobs summit today with all the staunch tax supporters. Get to writing fast and furious, and now it seems the IMF is even softening its stance big time. So we need to get on this, like seaside said, email the IMF as well, they have gotten a letter from NGOS to support the tax, here is the letter last month from all the NGO'S

Letter to IMF Head Strauss-Kahn from over 90 groups re. civil society participation in IMF study on how the financial sector can help pay for the bailouts - November 11, 2009
.November 11, 2009

Dominique Strauss-Kahn
Managing Director
International Monetary Fund,
700 19th Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20431

Dear Mr. Strauss-Kahn:

Re: Request for civil society participation in IMF study on how the financial sector can help pay for the bailouts

In September, the Group of 20 (G20), at their summit in Pittsburgh, mandated the International Monetary Fund (IMF) with preparing a report ahead of the next G20 summit in June 2010 to consider “how the financial sector could make a fair and substantial contribution toward paying for any burdens associated with government interventions to repair the banking system.”

We, the undersigned civil society organizations, citizens’ groups, social movements and other stakeholders, welcome this initiative and look forward to working with you on this important matter. We are writing with four requests:

1.As part of its report, the IMF should pay serious consideration to proposals for financial transaction taxes as a key tool for ensuring that the financial sector helps pay for government bailouts of their industry.
2.The IMF should establish a formal process for engaging civil society views in this initiative, both by setting up a clear channel for submitting written input as well as organizing public dialogues. The IMF has created such mechanisms for civil society dialogue in the past on other important matters, such as debt restructuring and cancellation, and more recently in the governance reform process at the IMF that you initiated.
3.The study should thoroughly explore the possibility of taxes on currency transactions and on all financial transactions, taking independent evidence from economists and academics who have looked at the feasibility of such taxes, modeling a range of different rates and analysing the technical feasibility and impact on different markets of unilateral implementation of such taxes.
4.The IMF should be open to the work of other international bodies that are focusing on this issue, such as the Taskforce on International Financial Transactions for Development, recently created by French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner under the auspices of the Leading Group on Solidarity Levies for Development.
Background on Financial Transactions Taxes
Since the outbreak of the crisis, a number of organizations and countries have pointed to the need for a financial transaction tax (FTT) to both help stem the speculative flow of a broad array of financial instruments and also generate resources for public goods. This alone would not resolve the crisis, of course, but it could play an important role in raising funds to compensate those who ended up paying for the resulting “bail-outs”.

Unlike a currency transaction tax or a “Tobin tax,” which just covers currency transactions, an FTT would have a much broader tax base, covering all kinds of financial assets such as shares, bonds, securities and derivatives, and both domestic and cross-border transactions. Technically the FTT can be levied easily and at very low costs since all stock exchange transactions are captured by electronic platforms. A simple electronic tag would automatically transfer the tax to the tax office. At a tax rate of 0.5 percent, it would also help curb speculative transactions that add little to the real economy.

Such taxes already exist. The most prominent example is the British “Stamp Duty”, which levies a 0.5 percent tax on the nominal price of any purchase of shares of UK companies and which has not lead to substantial tax evasion or the weakening of the City of London. Country specific financial transaction taxes exist in Austria, Greece, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Hong Kong, China, and Singapore. The U.S. state of New York levies a stamp duty on Wall Street (New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ) on all firms based there. Claims that financial transactions taxes are not feasible should therefore not be a serious concern.

Growing Support for Financial Transactions Taxes
As you are no doubt aware, many politicians have recently voiced their support for taxing financial transactions, among them French President Sarkozy and German Chancellor Merkel. U.S. President Barack Obama has also noted the need for “a Financial Stability Fee on the financial services industry so Wall Street foots the bill -- not the American taxpayer”. Your predecessor, former Managing Director Horst Köhler, now President of Germany, said at Chancellor Merkel’s swearing-in ceremony that the new German government should support an FTT. The U.S. House of Representatives is exploring the idea of an FTT, and European Commission President Barroso and Lord Turner, Chair of the British Financial Services Authority, are also favourable to the idea.

We want to add our voices to these calls for financial transactions taxes and to offer our input as you work to prepare a report of significant value to the G20. We consider this a critical component of the G20’s goal of ensuring the integrity and stability of our global financial system.

Sarah Anderson from the Institute for Policy Studies, Peter Wahl from Weltwirtschaft, Ökologie & Entwicklung (WEED) and Fraser Reilly-King from the Halifax Initiative Coalition will be following up with you on this request.

Yours sincerely,

11.11.11
ActionAid International
ACV-CSC
Africa Action
Africa-Europe Faith and Justice Network
AITEC
Alliance Sud
ARCI
Asamblea de Cooperación por la Paz (ACPP)
Attac Austria
ATTAC Belgium
Attac Catalunya
Attac France
Attac Norway
Attac Vlaanderen
ATWWAR (Advocates and Trainers for Women)
Both ENDS
Bretton Woods Project
British Musicians' Union
CAFOD
Campagna per la Riforma della Banca Mondiale
Campaign for America's Future
Canadian Union of Postal Workers
Center for a World in Balance
Changemaker
CIVICUS
Communication Workers Union
Debt and Development Coalition Ireland
Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era
Dominican Leadership Conference
Ethical markets Media ( USA and Brazil)
European marches against unemployment
European Network on Debt and Development
FDI Watch
FEMNET
FERN
Financial Action Network
Foreign Policy In Focus
Fundación Ágora S. L.
Fundacion Kirira
Ghana National Association of Teachers
Global Policy Forum Europe
Global Social Justice
GMB trade union
Halifax Initiative Coalition
IFIWatchnet
INKOTA-netzwerk
Institute for Policy Studies, Global Economy Project
Integrated Social Development Centre (ISODEC)
International Trade Union Confederation
International Federation of Business and Professional Women
International Food Workers Trade Union
Jubilee Australia
Jubilee USA Network
Kairos Europa
KEPA (Service Centre for Development Cooperation)
LACIGTN
Loretto Community
Make Poverty History Canada
Marianists International
Medical Mission Sisters
Missionary Oblates
New Rules for Global Finance Coalition
Norwegian Church Aid
Norwegian Forum for Environment and Development
Norwegian People's Aid
Osservatorio Italiano sulla Salute Globale (OISG)
Oxfam International
Oxfam Québec
Public Citizen
Public Services International
RESULTS Canada
Services Employees International Union
Sisters of Charity Federation
Social Watch
SOLIDAR
Somali Community Literacy Center
Stamp Out Poverty
Tax Justice Netherlands
Tax Justice Network
Tax Research UK
The Corner House
Third World Institute (ITeM)
Third World Network
Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD
Trades Union Congress (TUC)
UN Association of Australia
UNANIMA International
War on Want
WEED - World Economy, Ecology & Development Assoc.
Workers' Educational Association
World Development Movement
World Federalist Movement
World Party Organisation

Cc:
John Lipsky
IMF Executive Directors




Of course 99% of these are leftist, liberal groups.
 
Quote from seasideheights:

Over 200 economists have signed a letter in support of the financial transactions tax.

There's the letter.

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/economists-support-ftt/

The list of names follow the letter.

This isn't good.
I bet these 200 economic-theory-morons speculated in their past and lost much. To compensate for their failure they declare speculation as "evil" and that you have to go against it.
Nobody who studied economy can be so dumb to sign such a letter. It has to be out of emotional reasons.
 
Yes they are leftist leiberal groups, but you can see that after that letter and more pressure frmo UK they IMF softened the stance and the way they make it sound with Obama administration and other supporting it is not good! For what its worth I just got a letter, in the mail actually from another senator of mine. I got an email frmo a dem, opposing the tax, this letter is from my repub also opposing that tax. In the letter he specifically calls it a tax on mainstreet. I am in North Carolina , so our dem and repub senators both oppose this.
 
you are no doubt aware, many politicians have recently voiced their support for taxing financial transactions, among them French President Sarkozy and German Chancellor Merkel. U.S. President Barack Obama has also noted the need for “a Financial Stability Fee on the financial services industry so Wall Street foots the bill -- not the American taxpayer”.

well that last sentence alone should tell all what needs to be said. i financial transaction tax does just that. taxes the american taxpayer. so can we get anymore hypocritical in this argument coming from their own paper and quoting the president. so to me the president says no to the tax.
 
I'm actually stopping to trade today to write into every single person and entity I can think of, I recommend you all do the same thing before we no longer have the option to stop trading for a day because we won't be trading at all.
 
why aren't schwabs,amtds and even the banks and brokers more vocal opposing this? i've heard almost nothing from them. why aren't the brokers saying millions will lose there jobs. why aren't we seeing commercials?
 
Quote from MrPowerBallad:

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said today she sees a “great deal of merit” in imposing a tax on large stock transactions as long as other major nations do it as well. "

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adcaJQ1Xp4_w&pos=8

P.S. "large" ?

Well at least the article says the idea has received a cool reception from the Obama administration...

I'm surprised a reporter hasn't asked Robert Gibbs about the WH stance on the tax yet... Although he probably wouldn't answer anyway...

-Guru
 
This Bloomberg article says they are proposing a tax on "large" stock transactions. They used the word "large" twice. Why do you think they used the word "large"? Up to this point, I haven't heard anyone arguing for a tax on "large" stock transactions. It was always supposed to be a tax on "all" stock transactions. And what do you think "large" means?

Would 1000 shares of COF be considered "large"?

Hmm.

+-*/ Math_Wiz
 
Quote from Math_Wiz:

This Bloomberg article says they are proposing a tax on "large" stock transactions. They used the word "large" twice. Why do you think they used the word "large"? Up to this point, I haven't heard anyone arguing for a tax on "large" stock transactions. It was always supposed to be a tax on "all" stock transactions. And what do you think "large" means?

Would 1000 shares of COF be considered "large"?

Hmm.

+-*/ Math_Wiz

"Large" has been used several times before and they considered large $100k worth of transactions per year... to put that into perspective I've made $2.6 million dollars worth of transactions today and the day is only half over.
 
Quote from Math_Wiz:

This Bloomberg article says they are proposing a tax on "large" stock transactions. They used the word "large" twice. Why do you think they used the word "large"? Up to this point, I haven't heard anyone arguing for a tax on "large" stock transactions. It was always supposed to be a tax on "all" stock transactions. And what do you think "large" means?

Would 1000 shares of COF be considered "large"?

Hmm.

+-*/ Math_Wiz

Not sure what that means, plus she says stock, where as they meant all financial transactions, I do not think she would tax stock and not other asset classes, if anything she would tax other asset classes and not stock. More so called main streeters have stock then any other asset class
 
Back
Top