1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Les Leopold

A Tobin Tax on all Wall Street financial transactions also would move money from the financial sector to the real economy. A small fee would have almost no impact on 99 percent of Americans who invest long term for retirement or to pay for college. But the fee would dramatically impact the largest speculators who make billions of dollars worth of trades each day without creating one iota of value for the real economy. A Tobin tax could easily generate $50 billion a year for deficit reduction or job creation.

To put our people back to work we need to escape from the old debates. In our new billionaire bailout economy, jobs will be created when we directly create them and not before. Banks won't create them, nor will businesses until after the economy is humming again.

If we want to reduce our national debt, we need the super-rich and Wall Street to pay their fair share.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/les-leopold/stimulus-versus-debt-redu_b_373673.html
 
Quote from ksharmon:

Les Leopold

A Tobin Tax on all Wall Street financial transactions also would move money from the financial sector to the real economy. A small fee would have almost no impact on 99 percent of Americans who invest long term for retirement or to pay for college. But the fee would dramatically impact the largest speculators who make billions of dollars worth of trades each day without creating one iota of value for the real economy. A Tobin tax could easily generate $50 billion a year for deficit reduction or job creation.

To put our people back to work we need to escape from the old debates. In our new billionaire bailout economy, jobs will be created when we directly create them and not before. Banks won't create them, nor will businesses until after the economy is humming again.

If we want to reduce our national debt, we need the super-rich and Wall Street to pay their fair share.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/les-leopold/stimulus-versus-debt-redu_b_373673.html

So this tax won't impact 99% of Americans? What a complete line of BS. We really need to counteract this argument and get the word out...

Damn liberals:(

-Guru
 
Quote from OldTrader:

Anyone got a history of Cramers trades for the last couple of years? Why don't we apply the transaction tax to his record for several years and see how it comes out?

This guy is so dupicitous he should have been a politician.

OldTrader

I was asking for this information earlier, as I believe it could open Cramer's eyes and force him to speak out strongly against the tax. If you subscribe to his "Action Alerts" he claims to post every trade. Judging from his comments I would guess he turns over his portfolio at least 5 times a year. Only problem is I refuse to subscribe to his "Action Alerts." If anyone on this site has this info, it would be very useful.
 
One thing that I just don't understand. Outside of Rev., all the people that discuss this tax in the "trading" media(NOT general public) like Todd Harrison(minyanville) as well as all the cnbc anchors talk about it "nonchalantly" with the perception that this doesn't do much to significantly alter the current trading landscape. It's just a small "sacrifice" that traders could possibly have to make. Just like JC's view. I mean no one talks about it in the context of ending short-term trading period and the likes of etrade going bye bye. Are we the only ones doing the math? Why is this? Are they making the assumption that .25% is preposterous and is a given that it'll be watered-down? Where's the disconnect? This just drives me crazy.
 
Quote from jj69:

One thing that I just don't understand. Outside of Rev., all the people that discuss this tax in the "trading" media(NOT general public) like Todd Harrison(minyanville) as well as all the cnbc anchors talk about it "nonchalantly" with the perception that this doesn't do much to significantly alter the current trading landscape. It's just a small "sacrifice" that traders could possibly have to make. Just like JC's view. I mean no one talks about it in the context of ending short-term trading period and the likes of etrade going bye bye. Are we the only ones doing the math? Why is this? Are they making the assumption that .25% is preposterous and is a given that it'll be watered-down? Where's the disconnect? This just drives me crazy.

Why should "CNBC anchors" and the like have any clue about trading, let alone basic math?

:D
 
Quote from listedguru:

So this tax won't impact 99% of Americans? What a complete line of BS. We really need to counteract this argument and get the word out...

Damn liberals:(

-Guru


Everything on the Huffington Post this past few months has been totally for the tax!
 
Quote from Anaconda:

He also publicly states that he supports a strong dollar, lol.

So what? Bush/Paulsen also stated that they supported a strong dollar. You didn't hear them talk about a transaction tax, did you? lol
 
Quote from sculptor66:

Why should "CNBC anchors" and the like have any clue about trading, let alone basic math?

:D
Forget about having a clue. I mean isn't "End of Trading" serious news for them? My point is they just don't see the impact we see.
 
More CNBC crap about this tax.....SOMEONE has to shine light on how bad this tax is....even the causal swing trader would be put out of business!!

The fact the cramer did a 180 and now Todd over at minyanville now says it will happen...tells me that they know something we don't.

It just keeps making me more nervous and furious!!
 
Back
Top