1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Democrats push $150B stock tax on Wall Street
By Silla Brush - 11/24/09 12:05 PM ET

A House bill still being drafted aims to raise $150 billion each year to pay for new jobs.

Under a bill being drafted by Democratic Reps. Peter DeFazio (Ore.) and Ed Perlmutter (Colo.), the sale and purchase of financial instruments such as stocks, options, derivatives and futures would face a 0.25 percent tax.

The bill, a copy of which was obtained by The Hill, is titled the “Let Wall Street Pay for the Restoration of Main Street Act of 2009.”

Half of the $150 billion in tax revenue would go toward reducing the deficit, while the other half would be deposited in a “Job Creation Reserve” to support new jobs.

The job fund would be available to offset the additional costs of the 2009 highway bill and other legislation that creates jobs.

The Obama administration and congressional Democrats are looking for ways to create jobs after the nation’s unemployment rate hit 10.2 percent in October and job losses are expected to rise.

House leaders have mentioned the possibility of a tax on stock transactions, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) appeared to raise questions about the approach last week. Pelosi said such a move would need to be done in conjunction with efforts in other countries.

“Obviously, we have to work with leadership on this,” said Leslie Oliver, spokeswoman for Perlmutter. “It has a long way to go, but the idea is to stir debate … We think this is one idea that makes a lot of sense.”

The stock tax measure specifies that tax revenue would need to support jobs that pay at least the median wage in the United States, promotes manufacturing jobs and prohibits any recipient of the $700 billion financial bailout from directly benefiting from the job reserve fund.

The bill aims to exempt retirement accounts from the impact of the tax.

A group of consumer watchdog organizations and labor unions sent DeFazio a letter this week supporting the tax bill.

“Your bill would put Wall Street to work for the public good, by placing a modest securities transaction tax on trades of stocks, options and swaps. A tax on these trades has little impact on the average investor or pension fund because they hold their investments for the long term, but it does disincentivize Wall Street gambling and high-volume short-term speculative trading,” the organizations wrote.

The groups include: Americans for Financial Reform, Public Citizen, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the AFL-CIO, among others.
 
Quote from ksharmon:

For those of you who say that I stabbed you in the back by saying that I could live with this tax, let me remind you of something: I can live with any tax IF it helps create jobs.

You sir are one of the most gullible people I have read on ET for days. If some politician told you if he had sex with your mother that it would create jobs, would you believe him?

The govt has never been able to create jobs by taxing the public. What makes you think the same group of thugs who stole trillions from our children are suddenly turning over new leafs, starting with their desire to create jobs by taxing traders?

You MUST give me your email address. I know a girl who runs a spam company. You would click on every email you got, and she would make a dime from each one. Further, I have a few real estate agents that could use some business by selling you some Arizona glaciers and Alaska sand dunes.
 
Here's the fun fact of the day:

Of the 156 bills Defazio has introduced in the past decade, only 6 have passed and they were all specific to Oregon-related issues.
 
Matt Welch--Stock Transaction Tax: It's Like Slapping Yourself in the Face

http://reason.com/blog/2009/11/24/stock-transaction-tax-its-like

Though it pains me to say something so obvious, it is clear there is still a faction on the Left that doesn't understand why we have capital markets: Yes, it helps lucky or shrewd investors earn money (while making many of their brokers rich), but that's only one side of the equation. The other side is, companies get to raise money to finance their operations for such useful endeavors as ... hiring people.

It always astonishes me how liberals can complain, again and again, about how such and such community, or company, or sector desperately lacks "capital" or "investment," and then turn around and characterize Wall Street as some kind of bogus scam to make the rich richer and throw people out of work. Whether it's through a day-traded purchase of a brand new dot-com stock, or a 10-year corporate bond in GE, the capital markets allow companies to raise money that would otherwise not be available. It is an inherently democratic phenomenon -- you no longer need to curry favor with the local bank president or government official just to open up a business.

More here

http://web.archive.org/web/20010605133835/http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemId=10737
 
Quote from MrPowerBallad:

Here's the fun fact of the day:

Of the 156 bills Defazio has introduced in the past decade, only 6 have passed and they were all specific to Oregon-related issues.

Who cares. It doesn't have to be his version of the bill. A more "esteemed" legislator could write their own, wrapped in a different name and it could pass.
 
Back
Top