This is a comprehensive study loaded with statistics on the aftermath of a small STT to fund just the city of New York.
IBO New York City Independent Budget Office Background Paper
November 2003
Reviving the New York Stock Transfer Tax
http://www.ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/stocktransfertax.pdf
The tax would range from 0.625 cents to 2.5 cents per share, depending on share price.
So at a share price of $20 and a tax of 2.5 cents per share:
$0.025/$20=0.00125 or 0.125 percent rate which would be only half of the proposed tax of 0.25 percent.
IF investors do not migrate to other exchanges:
Trading volume would drop 18%.
60,000 jobs lost. (Those are just numbers, not people with families to feed)
Revenue gain would only be $3 billion.
$600 billion loss in equity value
$300 billion loss in household wealth
If trading activity drops by 1/3: 150,000 jobs would be lost and net city revenues would fall to ZERO.
I thought a trans tax was supposed to rake in hundreds of billions?
IBO New York City Independent Budget Office Background Paper
November 2003
Reviving the New York Stock Transfer Tax
http://www.ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/stocktransfertax.pdf
The tax would range from 0.625 cents to 2.5 cents per share, depending on share price.
So at a share price of $20 and a tax of 2.5 cents per share:
$0.025/$20=0.00125 or 0.125 percent rate which would be only half of the proposed tax of 0.25 percent.
IF investors do not migrate to other exchanges:
Trading volume would drop 18%.
60,000 jobs lost. (Those are just numbers, not people with families to feed)
Revenue gain would only be $3 billion.
$600 billion loss in equity value
$300 billion loss in household wealth
If trading activity drops by 1/3: 150,000 jobs would be lost and net city revenues would fall to ZERO.
I thought a trans tax was supposed to rake in hundreds of billions?