Quote from tomahawk:
As far as I know there's been no mention of only the losers of each trade having to pay the tax. They will collect .50% on each transaction (.25% from the winner, .25% from the loser).
A transaction tax would kill liquidity, which would be bad for the whole system. Long term investors buy from short term traders. If the short term traders are forced out, investors will have to pay UP for shares. Same on the way down ... crashes (especially the one that would occur right after such a bill passed) would be hideous.
Quote from Midas:
I copied the post I made in the last blog to this. This is a good site to get our voice out.
Quote from bears21:
time to dismiss this thread we all had some good laughs and valid arguments and angles but this tax is never ever gonna happen. they will drop the tax in the uk before we implement one here. anyone care to wager on this
Quote from BullAlert:
Fellow traders,
Another BIG-time proponent of this tax is John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard. As you should know, he is the father of "buy and hold" investing because it is beneficial to the mutual fund industry. Buy and hold has done wonders over the last 10 years, huh?
This loser is always on CNBC. I picked up a copy of this month's Worth magazine at the bookstore today and noticed he has a column for 6 rules to fix the financial crisis. Care to know what #6 is??
Drumroll please...
A f_cking tax on trading because of the evils of speculation.
I personally think we all need to band together, lobby congress and bulldoze ahead with a tax on the wealth of past and current MUTUAL FUND EXECUTIVES.
This shit has got to be squashed.