Vanguardâs full court press in the media to promote a financial-transaction tax is anti-competitive and self-serving for their interests.
Do we need a new onerous tax burden (financial-transaction taxes) on active traders and investors to force them into buying and holding mutual funds?
Are mutual fund investments so weak these days on their own market competitive merits, that they need help from Uncle Sam in penalizing and putting their competition out of business?
Buy in 2000 and hold until 2010 and have zero performance, plus plenty of risk.
There was a time when mutual funds were the hot new investment vehicle, back in the 1960s with infamous Bernie Cornfield of Dreyfus
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/965742/bernie_cornfield_mutual_fund_mogul.html. John Bogle founder of Vanguard probably remembers those old days well.
Mutual funds democratized the industry by bringing money management and asset allocation techniques to the little guy, whereas only the elite could afford those services before.
Well, we have innovated much since the 1960s and maybe mutual funds are losing some of their innovation-edge these days. Aren't there too many mutual funds and ETFs and index managers just packaging and selling the same indexes? Their buying and selling habits even affect market prices reaching a foregone conclusion.
Day traders and market makers using the Internet and discount direct-access brokers and new service providers has done to proprietary big-bank trading, what mutual funds did to elite money management. It democratized prop trading systems, tools and access to the little guy. Just as mutual funds innovated and brought elite resources to the mass market, so has the active direct-access trading industry.
Some people want to be passive and trust others to handle their investments. Others want to take direct control of their investments using all sorts of available tools including assets allocation tools too.
John Bogleâs full court press to bury the direct trading industry is very disingenuous and self-serving. For that matter, why do long-term investors get a lower long-term capital gains tax rate, why shouldnât all investors get that same benefit? He already has a major tax advantage and now he is asking for more?