Actually, if he could manage to compound that 3-month return of 2,000% just quarterly for the remaining 3 quarters of the year, then the actual annualized rate of return is closer to 926,000%, give or take, because he would have accumulated over $9.2 Billion by the end of the year. I, for one, think that Tums can do it. If not in this universe, then certainly in the parallel one next door.Quote from ByLoSellHi:
This is a ridiculous goal.
You're talking about a 2000% return in 3 months.
Good luck with all that.
If you can do that in 3 months, maybe you can annualize it and get 8000% on the year.
Quote from ByLoSellHi:
This is a ridiculous goal.
You're talking about a 2000% return in 3 months.
Good luck with all that.
If you can do that in 3 months, maybe you can annualize it and get 8000% on the year.
people who know the word "annualize" without really understanding its meaning or proper application, tend to annualize everything in their fantasy.Quote from Thunderdog:
Actually, if he could manage to compound that 3-month return of 2,000% just quarterly for the remaining 3 quarters of the year, then the actual annualized rate of return is closer to 926,000%, give or take, because he would have accumulated over $9.2 Billion by the end of the year. I, for one, think that Tums can do it. If not in this universe, then certainly in the parallel one next door.
Too much effort. If he had only chosen the correct numbers for the March 24, 2007 Canadian Lotto 6/49 draw (1, 13, 19, 26, 32, 46), then he could have made $20,000,000 with a $2 ticket. Tax free.Quote from blast19:
I don't know if anyone suggested it because I refuse to look through all of these posts...but did anyone tell you to buy $50k worth of NEW $15 Puts when it was trading at $25? Would have been easy!