Search results

I used to move these threads to chit chat when I was a moderator, and got crap for it.

He'll be back, just like he was the last 100 or so times. He was Port1385 and countless other names. And since you won't ban his IP (because he uses an anon proxy that many other users also use) banning him is absolutely pointless (even if warranted).

Thank you, Magna.

And if you required further proof of me being right, you need only see how upset he gets when it's pointed out. And I quit being a moderator. I was not removed. You may ask Baron or Joe themselves. Or magna, or Tgregg, etc. See ya.

Retaildaytrader is the same user as Port1385. Do a search on the user and see his past calls. They're of the same stupidity. Oh, he'll adamantly deny that he's the same user, but I know he is. Even without my (past) moderation power, all you have to do is look up the posts of Port in the...

its not hindsight if it goes back up to the 1058 area. thats where i think a top comes in, if it ever does.

The comparison was not related to skill in the market, but the desire to come back again and again and again in new screen names despite being removed from the site (obsessed, etc.) and promising not to return/post, etc.

fly down = rowshan/rubberbird/ and a dozen other names all banned. I was wondering when he'd resurface. What's next? Marketsurfer going to come and complain too? c-kid?

While you are certainly entitled to your combative opinion, would you mind posting some examples of my out-of-control behavior during the Election 2008 season that you refer to? Unless you were posting under a different name, I cannot recall ever discussing a single thing with you. Doesn't...

Your posts in this thread have had so many inaccuracies that it's difficult to know where to begin when addressing them. That and the fact that you're this old user really makes arguing with anything you say useless. That's right, I kept all the IPs, proxies and history. Not to mention...

Much appreciated commentary, folks. Thank you. I do, as Magna stated, have another username that I sometimes come here under. However, it is rare (thankfully) and when I am bored as I do not get anything out of this site other than a laugh once in a while. The reason I chose another...

I've been on this site for many years (sad to say) and a moderator for many of those years. I can truthfully say that atticus is not only one of the best posters/traders/market followers this site has to offer, but when he speaks, you would do wise to listen. I do. Ghoul is another. He's...

Ah, warms my heart to see worthless threads like this and many others cluttering the forums. After quitting being a thankless moderator on this site, I knew the trading forum was destined for this type of greatness. Spam on, my friends. Spam on.

Site management choosing to publicly "discipline" it's moderators (rather than just send a PM on something), which in turn leads to empowering trolls and demoralizing those who "work" as mods. Considering all the work I did here for free, it's simply not worth my time to "work" for folks like...

I used to be an active moderator on these forums for several hours a day. I have since resigned. I took a good look at the inane topics and silly behavior since I vanished and had a good chuckle this morning. Enjoy.

Complete and total ramp job on no volume. Again..

I don't know. What I do know is that I could have an equal chance at predicting the correct number as the IMF based on their past accuracy.

The IMF couldn't be less accurate if it were run by a conference room full of monkeys.

I've no doubt. I do not read anything from that site, but if they allow such ridiculous commentary as that in the OP, then all is suspect. I'm sure there are some good articles in there, but they should keep their eye on the ball and focus on reporting factual commentary. Editorials are open...

Oh, I'm not saying the speech was riveting or anything. It's just that the OPs post about how Obama bashed - well, anyone - was absurd.