Search results

You are correct Tony. It is better against symptomatic infection and it is remarkably strong against severe infection, irrespective of variant. July 7 2022. CONCLUSIONS Protection of natural infection against reinfection wanes and may diminish within a few years. Viral immune evasion...

Wow are you an asshole who will do anything to hide the truth. I did post the video... you troll. The links came from the section below the youtube video I posted. The doctor, quite respectably, gives the links which supported his graphing and statements. That is what honest people with...

Pay to post? Which journal? Which point? Prove to us using data from real studies that the vaccines are better than natural immunity over 6 to 12 months. Why do you have against the truth and data? I told you the summary of the data seen in the graphs came from all these journals. You can...

While I do not care what you think or who you think I am, I just popped in for a few days, Correcting this gwb bastard's 2 years of lies with the recent studies. I will be done here by tommorow. For now. I have other things to do.

Now lets check all your lies vs reality... from this Study from Qatar published July 7 2022. VS SEVERE INFECTION Natural Infection is superior and lasts longer than the covid vaccines vs severe infection Natural Infection offers 97.3 Percent protection against severe Covid irrespective...

You can see below by August of 2021 those who had their second shot in January of 2021 were seeing breakthrough rates of 50 do 74 percent depending on their age group. This is a data set from Isreal. A far more useful data set than the incomplete and inadequate data the CDC releases...

You are citing limited data sets based on reported positive tests and other Covid recorded events. Breakthrough rates require the tracking of the entire database not just those seeking tests. However, more importantly you are citing studies which ended their tracking during the time just before...

You just posted a complete fabrication. If you wish to have a discussion with me. Post facts. ==== with respect to the correction - "Correction note: An earlier version of this story reported that 0.5 per cent of those who have been fully vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna...

Your second link had a correction. It retracted the attribution of a .56 rate. Additionally the CDC data AND KFF data are not reporting breakthrough rates of delta across all vaccinees. You need to study the concept of breakthrough rate if you think you can derive the rate by only counting...

Regardless of what the Kremlin wants us to think, the world is on its way to multi polarity. It is what 90 percent of a elites seem to desire. We have transferred a great deal of our intellectual property overseas. We transferred our manufacturing base overseas. Our leading corporations...

a. Delta breakthrough rates were found to be 15 to 27 percent in multiple studies . (not less than one percent as you claim) For instance: This study in Houston found the breakthrough rate to be 23.7 percent. (an it did not track every breakthrough infection but on the ones where people...

You raise a great point. If the trials did not control for natural immunity and did not isolate those who would never have been hospitalized, how can any claims be made about the efficacy of mRNA vaccines with respect to hospitalization or serious adverse events.

Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest Results in this pre-print. Important parts printed below... a link to the study is just below. Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in...