Search results

  1. D

    The 95% consensus is now just 43%

    Here you go: http://skepticalscience.com/97-percent-consensus-cook-et-al-2013.html
  2. D

    The 95% consensus is now just 43%

    With the gravity of what is at stake, does it matter the precise level of certainty in the scientific community? Or is it enough to say, "This is profoundly dangerous, and Climate Scientists LARGELY agree on causes"? With the future of humanity on the line, it seems worth it to me to sacrifice...
  3. D

    The 95% consensus is now just 43%

    Jem-The vast majority of Climate Scientist are PRETTY DARN SURE that anthropogenic causes are driving Climate Change. They are not 100% sure because it is nearly impossible to be so sure in regards to something this vast. For just a moment, let's pretend that they are right. Anthropogenic...
  4. D

    The 95% consensus is now just 43%

    This post misquotes the study. You can read it here: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/ipdf/10.1021/es501998e 57% of these respondents being "less than 95% sure" hardly suggests that they don't think anthropogenic causes are the primary drivers; it simply shows that, as good scientists, they recognize...
Back
Top