Search results

....in the same way judeo-christianity hasn't made up the name of its own god but leached the hebrew one.

Gilbert is absolute power +1. Now God is not. ...let's see here, how does this self-complimenting thing go ?? ...

... establishing in your mind an incoherent self-contradicting mess of new age hippy word salad is not insane? ("trust me I'm a doctor") stu!

err...nurse , NURSE over here

...with the exception of Gilbert.

But everyone can see Christians exalting a myth which is often the case. If you truly believe someone is going to hell for their sins .....you may have some form of delusion or psychosis. That's a pretty bad thing. Would you possibly be better keeping that kind of thing to yourself, unless...

No. Animals never evolve . Animals never evolved. They were made one by one from a completely un-natural physically impossible form of super magic. The serpent appeared by magic in a story book and started to talk and that is how there is no evolution of the serpent. Snakes did not...

I don't think you can successfully argue a second hypothetical correlation disproves the first apparent one. On average that might well be the case, if the average person is religious. The idea that religion is not historically a source of barbaric conflict is disingenuous. Perhaps the...

Well I'm glad you are enjoying yourself. My answer to your questions is yes. I do think they would consider religion if they were religious. Bit of a no brainer really. Neither you nor I can possibly know what they are thinking, but it's not difficult to imagine religious people would be...

You'll have to explain. What questions would they be? There only appears to be sham argument in that video. Do you think we should consider sham arguments to be some sort of questions that require an answer?

Curious minds want to know! Lol yeah, sure they do! I start from the same place I think it fair to say everyone does. I don't have to believe anything or anyone. I don't have to believe the scientist or the creationist. It's going to take a lot more than some nutty professor with a...

If the average person is barbaric and the average person is religious ....erm

....in other words, you only need produce some misinformation, create false controversy about missing links, pretend there are no human fossils nearly 200,000 years old , then "filter" some gobbledygook written in a ridiculous story book so that it doesn't say what it says and means anything...

Keep your wig on Gann. The faulty fossil finding film freak is just lashing out because science wouldn't buy his own "original talking snake from the garden of eden fossil" you see there. More obvious though is how little confirmation you seem to need to judge things scam or no scam.

I'm being funny? yeah ok. So you are now saying there are no such things as scientific facts? And your reason for that would be because science sometimes gets things wrong. So getting something wrong cancels out scientific fact? You have to be kidding... right? You're having a laugh.

Didn't you say 'Ditch the formatting and receive the message'. The only message you get from Evolution is what..? "Something about a missing link" ? You have The Theory of Evolution as a fact and as scientific theory and as such it's a predicting mechanism which has continuously...

I'm not sure anyone would be better off for deciding to put themselves in denial of the facts or remain in ignorance of things they say they looked at.

Evolution is a fact and scientific theory substantiated by fact. The Bible is not. You show above one of many ways in which the Bible says kill . Ditch the formatting of the Bible message and receive the message? Are you sure?

You seem to be suggesting A proves but doesn't prove everything B doesn't prove because A doesn't prove everything therefore B proves something.