Search results

At first you made so much sense, I had trouble believing it was one of your posts I was reading. They you ruined what would have been a great post by throwing in something that makes no sense and seems to have been pulled from an extreme, far-right biased asshole, viz, ... When the leftists...

Thank you for your helpful comments. We appreciate your feedback, and will take into consideration your suggestions.

Just so you know . You're one of my favorite posters on ET. I read your posts and relish every word. And you are a real trader! I realize I am responding to a post you made in 2020, but who cares? it's still great! I wish you lived close to me. I would call you every time my neighbor has a...

This article has all the hallmarks of having been written by a lunatic. It intermingles truth, truthiness, and crazy shit to a lovely degree.

So how long until you call the top again?

It is going to be adjusted gradually over a number of years to 15, which will probably be just about right by the time we get there, because we are going to have some inflation in our future. I think you've forgot that 7.25 in 2009 was way way way way to low. The 1960 number adjusted is good...

Technically, he is right, but what he should have said, assuming your quote is accurate, is, "money printing won't necessarily lead to inflation." He is not quite so articulate as Bernanke. In a fiat money world, all outside money, which is the money created by a government and spent into the...

Wonderful step forward!

It's a job where I would think the main skills needed are management and communication skills. I don't think personal politics should matter so much for this position, but they probably will, it seems.

I'm not criticizing you, as you're not a scientist, and it's easy for the public to get the "ozone thing" confused with the current fracus over CO2. Just for the record, however, so that we don't spread misinformation, the "ozone thing" was real, did not have to do with global warming, and was...

You've proved your point already. Congratulations.

I think there may be at least one good, non-obvious, argument against this, but I prefer not to go into it.

"Solutions" to the environmental problems we create may be internally contradictory if the net result is an increase in the consumption rate.* Population control decreases consumption rate, so it constitutes a real solution to the environmental problems we create for ourselves. I wonder if the...

The most effective way we have to reduce the rate at which entropy is increasing on our planet is population control. And that's quite doable and extremely low cost relative to the benefits...but it's a very long term solution to the problems we create for our environment and we don't like to...

That's not necessarily true.

You should know in a year or less. Judging by Trumps behavior, if there's no evidence of crimes in those returns, you'd never have guessed it!

They were waiting for his twitter acct to be shut down.

FWIW here is a chart, courtesy of "Advisor Perspectives", without an inverted left axis: The link is in the upper right corner of the chart.

This is actually incorrect. You can be forgiven, however, for confusing government and personal finances. Nearly everyone does it.

No, it is NOT private.* The government is thoroughly in control, however representatives from private sector banking participate in Fed, Regional Branch Bank management. The private sector banks also have minor representation on the Fed's Board of Governors. Treasury and the Fed are different...