Search results

Recipe for religious doctrine, clairvoyants and voodoo in general. First, claim ownership of anything from the past which people were already doing for obvious reasons. Second, avoid mentioning some really batty bits plagiarized from previous religious beliefs which would sound really too...

Living by laws like that would mean theocracy. Careful what you preach for.

It's not the beliefs themselves, religious or whatever. Beliefs are two a penny. Beliefs which incorporate threats, direct or implied as you've made above, whether they are shared or taught, amount to the same thing. There is bound to be reaction in the face of such failures in human...

"Although I considered myself a faithful Christian.... ... I sympathized deeply with those who wanted to believe that there was a God somewhere out there who loved us unconditionally." The Daily Beast Just another of those... 'I've found God' moments from someone who already believed...

... a good argument for connecting religious references to legislative consideration.

...another good argument for keeping religious references away from legislative consideration.

Untrue. It gave him reason, that's all. ... that's a reason. ...no kidding. For that there's a simple reason.

Good point trendlover. These are people making political edicts based on nothing more than the crass and imbecilic contradictions of a religious impression, which ignores the facts of life and bans a means by which young teens giving birth, unwanted pregnancies, abortions and HIV aids are...

...of course the only way to know that is when scientifically proven. Nothing quite does like that good ol' self-correcting science stuff does.

It's not a point. Many observe the Earth appears flat. Your new point is no better than your old point. In the absence of evidence... it sure looks like the Earth IS flat... too. The point really is as it applies to one universe or many. Selection bias due to natural causes simply...

I know you have no science. That's what I've been telling you. The only one who keeps attributing poorly constructed and empty statements such as "best minds in the science" and "appears designed" as if they were something they are not, is you. I just call you out on them. But to coin a...

Science is self-correcting. Opening post is describing the process in action.

You have no data so do not make the call? Then why do you keep "making the call" by posting great lumps of copied text and referring to your own personal translations of it as if it was the data? Trying to say what the "the best minds of science" thinks, when all you are really arguing...

The false claims element of Religion 101.

Jem "stop being a troll dipshit"

What exactly is driving you to so irrationally demand things already supplied and explained; things right there in a quote you've just included within your own ridiculous post above. Rhetorical question. The answer of course is religious belief.

For goodness sake. Provide a link to what? How come you need links to things that don't need a link? The "link" is ... look up cyclic universe! It dispenses with your false assertion that Penrose is making an against all odds probability statement. You keep repeating the same silly...

Religion 101 three times on the trot. You can't help yourself can you.

There's no debate. It's been an observation for a while now on how completely absurd Jem can get.

If you weren't so busy throwing childish insults about you might start to get a hold on the following.... Go look up cyclic universe. It will show why your false claim about what you say Penrose is saying is not what he's saying. Next you'll be asking me to link gravity "to make the...