Search results

For as long as you continue to misinform yourself by reading and accepting everything said in open anti-abortion heavily biased subjective non independent propaganda websites, you'll remain as ignorant and wrong as you are now. The contraceptive pill stops ovulation, so there isn't any...

Yes you are wrong and insisting on being wrong repeatedly doesn't make you right. Contraceptives still aren't abortifacients and they're not going to be. But at least you've learned to spell the word correctly for once. There will always be some wingnuts somewhere saying they will have...

yeah yeah... everything you don't like is unconstitutional. Whatever. Should the process have gone through before the election you'd say it was hurried , but because it'll be after, it's been intended to squeak by. pffft. Religious institutions will file suit at the drop of a miter if they...

Government are not forcing religious groups. Everyone but you it seems knows as much. So what's your red-herring really about? Just so you can make cheap shot irrational and emotive religiously driven comments like "birth control which can causes homicides of human beings." ?

...and for nothing more than unrealistic idealism, you want to stop, control and restrict every move someone can make, even before it can be confirmed the bullet is going to hit. Because you can't keep up with the argument doesn't mean I changed it.

Typical. You can't rationally debate and so resort to the usual name calling. Too emotionally wound up in all your religious bullshit. Contraceptives' primary function is to delay ovulation. Not an abortion. Arbitrarily deciding your own science on religious grounds, isn't science.

epm.org ?... are you kidding me!? "Remember Us and Pray for Us: the Persecuted Church" That's no debate. It's a mess of misinformation and religiously driven propaganda. The common pill is a contraceptive intended to avoid conception. Lots of other common ordinary things may cause an...

In that case you have no grounds for your objection. I find being forced to pay tax plus any number of other things that society demands of me as objectionable. Such as being forced to let religion off paying tax at all for instance. This is America thank goodness, so you get to puke...

I have no problem up to the point where you attempt to supplant what are society's more pragmatically reasonable values, moral foundations or principles with your religion of the dark ages. :)

Warning: Crying wolf to play the religious persecution card damages your credibility. LA Times Holding up anti-contraception as a value, moral foundation or principle is unrealistic to put it mildly. It's ostrich mentality. In practice does far more harm than good. The world doesn't...

I completely disagree. If you're going to generalize, people generally, genuinely and fundamentally do things because it's the right thing, irrespective of religion, which of course can and does cause wrong doing as well. There is no better reason to do good than for the sake of it. Bottom...

You're talking about extreme people taking things to extremes, not getting divorced. People do that in many other ways than with bibles and religion. Maybe you need to get around more. :)

People are that way who don't get religious. That's assuredly deserving more respect. Surely you first respect someone for their deeds not because they need an opiate in the form of religion to fix them that way.

Bible thumping catholics out of wedlock not withstanding! It's a ridiculous argument to assume because you know some stable religious households, religious households are more likely to be stable. An association fallacy. No doubt you'll know dogs have four legs 'cause you've met a lot. So...

The point at issue is surely WHY a religious believer believes, not that they are stupid. Reasons given, are rational or not but stupid reasons are what they are. If people need those to give them personal strength, then it is a matter that attracts and deserves critical questioning. I...

Honest or even intelligent would be better and a first for you. You think it's preferable to have someone who thinks they're going to "a better place" with a finger on the nuke button. duuuh

I've already explained it's a spurious argument. There is no reason to presume a broken home is any more or less likely because of or despite religion.

Busting ass for your kids is not religion, does not require any, nor is it reason for any. I think you're confusing separate things. There are plenty of broken homes made by religious families. Generalizations don't make the rule.

...so what.

The incorrect conclusion must be that it is something which can be explained by anything but brain chemistry. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa070010