Search results

So what was all your fuss about really ? Was it only that you wanted assert the idea that theoretical physics is the same kind of speculative as groundless assumptions for an unnatural 'creator/tuner'?

Only because you are. You even posted the link yourself which shows as much. You do that a lot. Post links that totally undermine what you are claiming. Amazing. Yes, it is the same. You expressed both those things. What is it with you two. Trying to form a synchronized lying team or...

So you're agreeing to it all being speculation. You said so. God. Speculation. You must agree then with the context he allows god onto a list with. The one where he might as well have allowed The Spaghetti Monster on it. Speculation. Luck. Speculation. But you stop agreeing with him when...

Like I say, it's incredible to watch you lying. Seems you can only make god manifest itself in your head when you lie.

Incredible watching you lie to yourself again here, and then post it up. It was not "sort of like it but a bit different" . It was you lying by insisting as you still do, I said "there was plenty of science saying showing life evolved from non life." I said there is plenty of science...

...speculation you say... it's all speculation . Except of course if you decide it isn't.

Because you change words in your head when you can't deal with what was actually said to you does not mean I'm lying. It's sign of a bigger problem you have.

So it's like I said 50 pages or so ago. You basically have no argument to make other than "everything is speculation". And you agree with someone who gave no explanation of god, but who did explain intelligent design is an illusion.

So you don't agree with Susskind then. Which is it?

"The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design" You agree with Susskind? No "Tuner"? Really?

Obviously not.

Why would any sensible person do any such thing? Are you capable of elaborating without the childish ad-homs.

That's just gay.

Your angy shit has already been debunked. You have no answer but to post the same angry shit over, again and again and again. You are the archetypal...

Complete speculation based on math and laws of physics is still not going to be the same thing as complete speculation based on wishful thinking and make-believe. No matter how many times you boringly "ultimate full of shit troll" out the same old stuff.

I bring up the same boring points because you keep trying to make them. To argue someone is giving god and chance and luck as explanations, but who then doesn't explain any of them, is no type of argument at all. To call on an authority as you've done, and then actually post a link to...

Why did you leave a. out? If your authority Susskind is speculating, then he is speculating on all 4 explanations - only one of which he gives explanation for. You can't see any difference in substance between a b c and d when the only one he gives explanation for and substance to, is...

I'd bet you're right. A five worder was probably pushing it.

That'll be because you can't or won't accept you made a self-contradictory self-defeating statement, and then followed up trying to blame bigarrow for the same mistake you, not him, had already made. Seriously, what don't you get?

Lol. Now you're just getting too desperate.