Search results

Forget it, jem. You're in over your head.

It can. Check your constitution under duties of the Court. Little known clause. Never as yet used to my knowledge. The concern would be opening a pandoras box, if the other party should ever gain complete control. This is what Gingrich was ineptly referring to when during the republican...

The Congress must Codify Roe and Direct that the Statute be non-reviewable. [This would send a well-deserved chill through the Court and make it clear which body is Constitutionally Superior. ]

Your confused, again. It is the Texas Law that is Flagrantly Unconstitutional, according to Sotomayor; not the majority opinion, which represents inattention to duty with significant repercussions.

Which Christian academy were you "educated" in, or were you home schooled?

You meant "can"?

Maybe read, my post#15 again? The phrase following the last comma is, "...for if a market is free by one definition it is likely to not be free by the other."

Have you noticed that when to go to a restaurant post covid that they are slipping the spoon to you upside down when the waiter sets the table. just wanted to call you attention to that so you can be watching for it...

Ooops. I should have said, ..."It's a combination of the two definitions that lead us to conclude there is no such thing as a free market, for if a market is free by one definition it is likely to not be free by the other.

Xi Jinping has a more socially responsible definition of Free Markets than the typical businessman. Xi's definition is the same as what you'd likely get from a person you stop randomly on the street and ask for a definition of the term "Free Market." They are more likely to stumble around and...

This is true so long as the word "supposed" is in there. And Soros would agree with this statement so long as "supposed" is included. On the other hand, Soros is famous for recognizing that real markets do not reflect reality most of the time, even though they are "supposed" to. According to...

Nicely said, and I fully agree that we investors will benefit from keeping our eye on developments in renewable energy sources.

To do this, there is a wide range of options. You can either turn your monitor upside down, or you can stand on your head or hang by your ankles while trading with eyes glued to your right-side-up monitor. Any of these methods should work equally fine. Hopefully someone will soon try one of...

FWIW, in regard to my post #65 above, I just happened by serendipity to come across the official name of the prize given to economists and appearing in the the Press as the "Nobel Prize" or alternatively "The Nobel Memorial Prize" . The official named turns out to be: "The Sveriges Riksbank...

This is a really great question, one that's been in my mind for some time. I have a fairly high opinion of Volcker, but he is not without his critics. I do know his experiment with trying to control the money supply ala' Friedman was apparently a failure. As a matter of fact I am currently...

Thanks. Don't expect much more than tropical storm weather here. I read her book.

I have a little time on my hands now as we wait for the Eastern fringe of IDA to pass by and dump torrential rain on us. Most everything except our communication channels has shut down or is in process of doing so. So I should like to use this "waiting time" to comment on Wang's very nice book...

ha ha. Good for you to notice that. But it is after all the same pompous conservative that is the victim in both instances. This is not an accident. I assure you. It is the unavoidable statistics! Conservative are, by their nature, wrong about almost everything. :D

OK. Thanks. I thought later that must be what you meant.

The thing about these good natured jabs is that they make you feel superior while the jabee is so supremely confident in his superior knowledge that he doesn't feel a thing. However when the tables are turned and the jabee jabs back, the prick is painful indeed and may invoke silly defensiveness...