Search results

How to give a moron rightie a heart attack...... Sneak up behind them and yell ...BENGHAZI! lol So much from so little.

It's very simple. Capital punishment is wrong. Period. That's all. Can you moron righties understand that? No? Didn't think so.

So you still think something from a right wing think tank about GW is NOT propaganda? Really? Are you really THAT stupid?

Actually the IPCC is generally the world's most authoritative comprehensive source of climate information that the world has. But if you think they are not then I see your problem. You are deluded by right wing propaganda. Like the kind you posted.

And what does that have to do with it? We are talking about "capital punishment" , not this particular horrible case. Try to keep up.

Maybe you missed this.. and the NIPCC is nothing more than propaganda from the Heartland Institute. http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/2...dibility-test/

Do you really think propaganda from a right wing think tank is the same as real science? You must be very gullible.

\ All that stuff above is wrong or irrelevant...... and CO2 is still a GHG and we have raised it's levels by 40% so temps are going up and will continue to do so as CO2 levels continue to increase as we pump more CO2 into the atmosphere. There is an overwhelming consensus about this in the...

Murray, the world climate (temperature) models are basically predicting a trend. There are few variables that are predictable other than CO2 emissions, and they follow a steady low volatility curve. Even the predictable 11 year solar cycles have next to no influence on the modeled temp...

So then it's ok by you if innocent people are put to death so that you can exact your savage punishment to the guilty ones. Just the price of punishing someone huh? Who really cares if a few innocent people are killed in the pursuit of justice. Do you righties ever think things through?

So I guess by this you mean that you still don't comprehend how a GHG works. Oh well. You are simply hopeless I guess.

Once again on yet another topic you are confusing your intentional ignorance with what science is saying. You know who would win a Noble prize? A scientist that could prove CO2 is NOT a GHG. You STILL don't know what a GHG is do you? Why can't you learn?

Here you go max....in case you don't really don't want to know...... There have been 316 post-conviction DNA exonerations in the United States. • The first DNA exoneration took place in 1989. Exonerations have been won in 36 states; since 2000, there have been 249 exonerations. • 18...

and how many people convicted of murder were later found to be innocent? Any idea? Or is this new information for you?

CO2 is doing it, because CO2 is a GHG and it's levels are rising due to the burning of fossil fuels which releases, wait for it...................CO2. It's very simple. Even you should be able to understand it. You do know CO2 is a GHG right? Have you figured out what that means yet?

What? That chart is a yearly chart going back many years. We are looking at 20,50,100 years from now before needing to withdraw. Before we retire. The climate models predict these long term trends. The long term trend has not been broken. The models are still valid. It's simple as...

If this were the price of a stock and one was long term holding, would this a time to sell or perhaps add to the position? Is the long term trend broken?

In addition Arnie. Your charts are not of world temps and are very select data sets that show the least warming. The balloon data sets for instance are mid latitudes only which show the least warming. I'll leave it up to you to figure out why the chart is so deceptive.

Arnie. You're right wing propaganda sources say the models have failed. They have not. Arnie, do you trade? Have you ever seen a stock price trend go in a smooth straight line? Of course not. The trend is defined by deviations around the mean. Climate models predict trend only...

Too short a time span. We're talking about climate here, not weather. What "govt adjustment"? Do you mean the scientifically proper adjustment for the heat island effect?