Search results

Really? Coal, oil, natural gas, all of the metals and minerals, fresh water from aquafers, snow melt and glaciers, just to name a few.

No, you are wrong. Get over it and move on.

Sorry, as usual on this topic, you are wrong and delusional. The article and charts within it speaks for itself. It does it so well that you have to make up some shit about the comments. Pathetic.

Hmmmm, interesting video. I suspect it depends on the nature of the destruction. I do know that Sandy brought a lot of money into the area afterward. Contractors of all kinds did very well. I was one of them. The losers were the insurance companies. But I suppose then the insurance...

But moron, it is true isn't it? Did he say it was a GOOD way? Of course not. You are a typical right wing idiot. Not a bit of brain matter. You are able to read far right wing bullshit though huh? Get a clue.

To understand the start of a new universe one needs to understand the end of one. For in the end of one begins another. A snake swallowing it's own tail. A quantum consumption and resurrection where nothing ever truly ends nor begins.

So Bush was an environmentalist pussy? In his State of the Union Address on January 31, 2006, President George W. Bush stated, “We'll also fund additional research in cutting-edge methods of producing ethanol, not just from corn, but from wood chips and stalks or switchgrass. Our goal is...

Here you go 666. Something other than your right wing propaganda/disinformation. I don't expect you will look at it objectively. Global warming predictions prove accurate Analysis of climate change modelling for past 15 years reveal accurate forecasts of rising global temperatures...

Let me repeat. The models have certainly not failed. Your right wing propaganda sources say they have but really, they haven't. You are deluded. Oh, and CO2 is still a greenhouse gas. Do you know what that is? Would you like to see some facts? Would they mean anything to you?

But you are mistaken, the models did not fail. The temps are still well within the predicted ranges. Air temps never go in straight lines. Regardless, virtually the entire world's science community is an agreement about it.....still.

BTW, when I say AGW is a fact, I mean it is as sure as that cigarettes cause health problems. 95% or greater probability.

You do realize that AGW is a fact right? That the warming is certainly NOT natural? That we can pay a little now or a lot more later? And that yes, "somebody has a clue" about when the next ice age may occur. So, aside from being totally wrong, you're right. Good to see somethings...

Bullshit. You were trying in your weasily lawyerly way to inject God into it by misrepresenting what the scientists are saying,,,,as usual.

Are you kidding? Do you have any idea what grazing cattle do to slow growing and fragile desert ecosystems? Ever hear of dust storms?

Disbelief in God and immortality among NAS biological scientists was 65.2% and 69.0%, respectively, and among NAS physical scientists it was 79.0% and 76.3%. Most of the rest were agnostics on both issues, with few believers. We found the highest percentage of belief among NAS mathematicians...

I may have overstated when I said most top cosmologists are atheists, but not by much. researching...

You have a problem with basic logic don't you? Explains your GW position also. I'll make it simple. They have not found the beginning of the universe. No matter how you want to interperate it. Therefore nothing can be said about what went before. The fact that it may have been in a...

Most of the top cosmologists - you know, the people who know the most about how it happened - are atheists. And the higher level of knowledge and expertise in the area of the natural sciences, the more likely that the person is an atheist. In short, the more someone knows about nature, the...

Completely and totally wrong, as usual. Wow you are really deluded. In multiple ways.