Search results

It isn't. - Spydertrader

Do not mistake silence for failure to comprehend. Time represents an arbitrary measurement of effectiveness and efficiency. I recommed a review of the Carpenter who hammered nails incorrectly for 20 years. I provided an answer. Just because you don't like the answer provided, doesn't...

Print out a whole bunch of Charts with nothing on them - except Price and Volume. Grab some pens and a straight edge, and annotate away. Or, scroll back in time to whenever you like, and do the same task in a digital fashion. This should cut the time from 10 weeks to 10 hours. :) - Spydertrader

The above viewpoint represents a 'gradient' outlook with respect to how one needs to 'see' the maket, rather than, a 'binary' mentality. In other words, one cannot trade what one cannot 'see.' Once a trader can see what must come next - on each and every bar (with respect to the sequences which...

Probably because most everyone else determined the answer you received made perfect sense, and as such, your question required no further response. If you require additional information in order to make a more informed decision, I recommend obtaining said information yourself, rather than...

Oddly enough, I provided the answer before you asked the question. :) - Spydertrader

Today's ES Chart

Just saving room in order to have the ability to post the charts 'in line' with the thread. I've received a few requests to include the times and Price, so I'll break up the charts into various sizes in order to comply. - Spydertrader

Probably because a trader learns much more from the Monitoring Process than simply how to draw lines. :) - Spydertrader

Don't toss out your thinking just yet. Note the dashed blue up traverse from 15:45 to 16:00. I had it in place before the close of the 16:00 Bar, and felt mighty confident - right up until the 16:05 pulled an If1. As a result, I need to review that section in an effort to make sure I...

Close. A gap in the opposite direction of the last traverse (or channel) on the previous day. A gap in the same direction allows for continuation of the previous traverse (or channel). However, yes. Properly oriented, a trader should not need the Carryovers. - Spydertrader

Automated Culling of Equities (one click and you are done). Automated Dry Up (and other Pace Lines) and a few other things. :) Trade Navigator - Spydertrader

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1998691>

You are missing a few things, which I recommend adding, and you have added a few things, which, fail to provide helpful information. - Spydertrader

I wonder if following the directions I provided (drilling through 20 - 60 charts) might assist your discovery process. - Spydertrader

No it doesn't. First, Bar seven does not show peak volume. Second, I have already provided the answer to this question. Third, The GuavaMan wasn't asking you a question which required you to respond to him. Guava attempted to guide you in a direction with his interrogatory. -...

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1998482>

Because it isn't a Traverse. The Pink Point Three Represents the first Down Traverse in the chart you posted. - Spydertrader

Yesterday, the Final Four Bars of the Day created a Down Traverse. This Morning, Price 'gapped up.' As such, the market showed we had nothing "to continue" from the previous day. In such an environment, adding Carryover Channels represents a useless exercise. Now, I could have annotated an Up...

Probably because no Lateral Exists in that location - at least not one which we care about. - Spydertrader