Search results

Problem is, we can’t legitimately trust the numbers.

Nice deflection from whether the polls are accurate or not. If Pollsters say their poll are accurate to 3% and they are consistently inaccurate, always favoring a non Trump Presidential candidate as seen in 2016 and 2020, at best it shows incompetence. At worst, it shows a coordinated effort...

Being off by 200 to 700 basis points, especially anything over 500 basis points is outside the statistical margin of error, yet polls conducted by many pollsters on a frequent basis over Trump’s term have been conistently grossly wrong. It is safe to say polls in modern US Presidental...

You still talking about polls having any value? Excerpts of each article below: This time, prognosticators made assurances that such mistakes were so 2016. But as votes were tabulated on November 3, nervous viewers and pollsters began to experience a sense of déjà vu. Once again, more ballots...

Selling premium as in a short straddle.

The following is an opinion piece by George Packer, staff writer at the Atlantic. This piece seems to be is a good representation how many Leftists see the world of politics involving Trump. I will go through this article and provide my opinions and counterpoints along the way. Obviously...

Time for another daily roundup of sources indicating election fraud: First up is an article that dicusses the GA Senate runoff, but I wanted to quote this part in particular: “More than 40% of voters nationally don't believe the 2020 election was legitimate, according to a poll of 1,500 U.S...

Your post sounds like justification for removing Trump from office using nearly any means possible, including election fraud. Or as Kathy Griffen might suggest, any means possible. Believe it or not, I have entertained this idea myself and have posted as such. It seems possible that key...

It appears I accidentally quoted you. My post was in response to El OchoCinco’s post where he suggested that election fraud has not occured in previous US elections.

Even if one out of maybe near a hundred witnesses at this point is impeached, at least the Trump Campaign still has the others. So no, the case of Election Fraud in the 2020 US Presidential Elections is not closed and Rudy Giuliani did not lose. Nice try. The point I making in the post you...

It sounds like the US Supreme Court acts upon legal principle and is not partisan, right? Therefore, should the US Supreme Court rule in favor of the Trump Administration, you would be ok with that, right?

Opinion piece from American Thinker: You and I are witnesses to a crime; we are witnessing a criminal conspiracy to steal the American presidential election. What, in your opinion, is this crime's most astonishing feature? Is it how brazen it is? It is, after all, being done right out in...

Oh crap, could you call Rudy and let him know? I would hate to see them waste their money and everyone’s time: Trump apparently stated he will fight, if necessary, until January. Part of the article, “Justice Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is...

Having same problem. Logged out and restarted my computer. On login page, a notification says “Due to technical issues clients may be unable to connect through our web, mobile, and destop trading platforms. We are working to address the issue”.

It is truly comical that Democrats act like their sole witness is the Second Coming of Jesus, while Mrs Ford, who deleted her social media accounts before testifying, gets shot down, while Republicans are probably nearing a hundred corroborating witnesses, with more likely coming forward each...

Is there anything that could change your bullish stance before having to absorb an nearly 400 point hit? Such as an acceleration of call buying volume by retailers?

The system has been gamed before 2020. Just ask Congressman Pete Sessions. Again, suspicious, impossible or nearly impossible statistical anomalies, corroborating witnesses who signed affidavits, including election officials, poll watchers, and electronic voting experts, a media that initially...

Even a blind nut can find a squirrel sometimes!

The people deserve answers to our election irregularities, regardless where it leads. This is a fundamental aspect to Democracy. Hopefully, substantial election reforms come out of this as well so we don’t have to repeat this confidence draining debate.

Your statement, without a supported counterpoint, versus personal observation and experts? Hmmmm, which way do I steer? You are a particularly intelligent poster, but I have to ask, “Where’s the beef”? Metaphorically speaking, of course.