Search results

This is just the forward to the first chapter in the "The Strange Presidency of Donald Trump." Wait until those agencies try to find money to build his "wall" without a specific appropriation from Congress. That will be entertaining. Then there is the loss of half a trillion in commerce...

In the report I heard the reporter said "without evidence". Though I understand that "incorrect" and "without evidence" are not the same , you may not. But frankly the reporter was being unnecessarily cautious. He could have said "incorrect" with a virtually zero probability of being...

That's incredibly cheap. We could only kill 2000 Iraqis for that paltry sum.

Sadly for you guys the photos being compared by the legitimate press were all taken during the inauguration. However the photos you are being shown on the alternative facts websites are not necessarily comparable. You are being led down the primrose path. Alex Jones loves you folks. You're...

I like some of the things that Trump has done, not everything to be sure! But don't you think it is a little too early draw conclusions,e.g., "done more to save our country." I would suggest waiting more than a couple weeks to see how what he is doing pans out. Just a friendly suggestion. He...

Like, for example, how are we going to deal with the fact that our President is delusional. Whether he seems to be doing things that the majority is in favor of our not, there is great danger in having a mentally imbalanced person at the helm. I am hoping that the Republican Congress will step...

You are a very sick. Get help!

I just checked. I'm not wetting myself yet. Does that mean I'm not a nasty "Liberal".

Hypocritical behavior would be, for example, to say that "rich people don't pay enough taxes" and then if you are rich, and your taxes are raised a small amount, to complain about the higher taxes. If Buffet paid more than his share of taxes under the current tax code, he'd be behaving...

The phrase "freedom fighters?" has become synonymous with defenders of "American Corporate Hegemony." But we are a eusocial species, and all we need is a rallying cry and a fine poster to get us to act like fools. Only a fool would willingly put their life at risk for Halliburton's profits...

That's not very smart. When the U.S. interferes with democratic elections around the globe, as we have made a practice of doing whenever we did not like the likely outcome, we were smart enough to lay low and keep out of sight. Our hapless targets didn't find out until later that we screwed...

Yup. That could be the secret sauce alright! And that sauce comes in mighty handy when your goose is cooked. We are fortunate to still have some sauce left in the pantry.

Actually it was the other way around. Dickie Cheney told the CIA to tell Bush that Iraq had WMDs so he and Bubba could invade Iraq, nevermind who might get killed besides Saddam, because they knew they weren't going to be the ones. Cheney went over to the CIA almost every week hounding them to...

At least we are moving in the right direction. That's encouraging.

Did I read this correctly, or was 2003 somehow not in the 21st Century? :rolleyes:

This statement of yours, so far as I can tell, is an accurate statement. Put what is it's point if other than to mislead? According to the Recent (2014) study of the opinion of scientists working and publishing in the field of climate studies/"global warming" reported in the Bulletin of the...

Well Michele is well liked so that a step in the right direction, but there is no creativity in that choice. Nothing to really spark a lot of free media coverage. Not enough outrageousness! The perfect candidate would be a nominally male, olympic figure skating medalist. That would be a way to...

Unfortunately I don't have a subscription. I am watching the stock. I'll be a buyer below 9, if it gets there.

I don't disagree with any of this except the suggestion the democrats could have passed anything they wanted. The problem there is what did a majority of democrats "want" and was it a big enough majority to pass any thing the majority of democrats "wanted". It certainly wasn't in the Senate! I...

I'll try again. I have to type very slowly. You can confirm this easily. The public option was in the original bill introduced in the house and I think passed by the House, but even then the democrats did not vote as a block. 39 voted against it. But the Senate had its own version of the Bill...