Search results

  1. P

    How long until the leftist claim 'disproportionate force'?

    The politics of the Middle East is too complex for you to have a chance to grasp it. However JACKASS Trump's role in unnecessarily stirring up trouble in the Middle East is not complicated. It surprises me, therefore, that you aren't able to understand how Trump's unwise decision to move the...
  2. P

    How long until the leftist claim 'disproportionate force'?

    "I'm the only one that can fix it." --- D. J. Trump
  3. P

    How long until the leftist claim 'disproportionate force'?

    Because we would not have withdrawn from the Iran Nuclear accord had it not been for him. He is responsible for this idiotic action.
  4. P

    FDHBFIN where is it?

    From Google...
  5. P

    How long until the leftist claim 'disproportionate force'?

    His actions probably increased the probability of "this" happening. That's very different than saying he was directly responsible. My remarks were carefully chosen and intentionally nuanced.
  6. P

    How long until the leftist claim 'disproportionate force'?

    Those are your words not mine. I stick by what I posted.
  7. P

    All Wars are Bankers Wars

    This is a steaming pile of horseshit skillfully synthesized out of truths, half truths, innuendo, and dis-information. Many of the components are not even applicable to today's world. This pseudo documentary cum horseshit is going to be an effective manure spreader. This is not to say that...
  8. P

    How long until the leftist claim 'disproportionate force'?

    A reasonable argument can be made that this current Gaza -- Israeli blow-up might have been avoided altogether or substantially muted had Trump not withdrawn the U.S. from the seven-nation "Iran Nuclear Deal", which took years of painstaking negotiations to achieve.
  9. P

    How long until the leftist claim 'disproportionate force'?

    You're thinking with your dick again. The return of impounded Iranian money has been explained ad nauseum. Try reading.
  10. P

    Time to lock in 4.7% returns on your savings for 10 years?

    That would explain all those tents, camels and sand storms in Winnipeg.
  11. P

    Time to lock in 4.7% returns on your savings for 10 years?

    There can be no question that all of Canada has gone insane! The iron-clad proof of this was recently made clear to me. In July, I was forced to endure a week in Canada. I was staying at the Fairmont, horrible hotel --- Muslims everywhere you looked --- smack dab in the middle of downtown...
  12. P

    Time to lock in 4.7% returns on your savings for 10 years?

    They can't. But people acting on behalf of the government might try. They will be subject to challenge.
  13. P

    Time to lock in 4.7% returns on your savings for 10 years?

    On the surface, this would seem to be an outrageous charge. A little detail or a link might help me accept it as having a basis in fact. Otherwise I am going to dismiss it as nonsense. Whenever you read something that sounds as though it can't possibly be true, it probably isn't.
  14. P

    Are we at peak rates for T-Bills?

    BOING!!! :rolleyes: This would be fun to see. The market decides to retail loan at 4% while Banks are loaning to each other at 5.5%. Then Chase goes to a Manhattan pay day lender to borrow at 4% because Goldman is going to charge them 5.5% . YeeHaw :D:D:D
  15. P

    Are we at peak rates for T-Bills?

    What measure of money supply are you using, or what is the source of these numbers? What comprises your 8T? Let's just assume that during QE the Fed bought back 8 trillion worth of Treasury securities from the private sector by marking up private sector bank reserve accounts over the period...
  16. P

    Bill Maher nails it.

    Your thinking would be appropriate in an alternate and stagnate Universe where planets didn't rotate, their was no such thing as the passage of time, and nothing moved or changed. So their was nothing to give meaning to the concept of things lasting "forevermore".
  17. P

    McCarthy losing is bad for equity and debt mkts

    Interesting question. And I think we have the answers already. First we now recognize that taxes are not for the purpose of raising money to spend. For spending, we can either tax or not tax, it doesn't matter; yet taxes must remain an important component of government money operations...
  18. P

    McCarthy losing is bad for equity and debt mkts

    1. Can have, if the Fed accomodates by buying securities. But usually not accompanied by inflation. Deficits, by themselves, can't cause inflation because they leave the net supply of transactional money unchanged. 2. Not unless the Fed accommodates into a full-employment economy, which they...
  19. P

    McCarthy losing is bad for equity and debt mkts

    If you look at older literature you will find discussions of how government borrowing might compete with private sector borrowing, "crowding out" the private sector, as it were, and driving up interest rates. This thinking however was predicated on a misunderstanding of what we call...
  20. P

    McCarthy losing is bad for equity and debt mkts

    Yes, it will be, and what you are thinking isn't quite right. Haven't the time at the moment but I'll come back and explain.
Back
Top