Search results

  1. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    And I just said. It was due orbital changes. Malankovitch cycles. This is elementary stuff that you could have easily determined yourself by using Google. But the large swings are due to the feedback of CO2/water vapor/ice and temps. Were it not for CO2 there would not be the large swings.
  2. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    The 40% increase in CO2 over the last two hundred years is due to man. It occurred when we started burning fossil fuels. We know how much we have put in the air. The isotope signature shows it from man. There is no question about this. It is not some natural cycle.
  3. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    So now you're depending on the sun to magically cool down at a far greater rate than it ever did in history with no reason to believe that it will? LOL. Sun output changes have NEVER been the thing to cause the ice age cycles. It was subtle orbital changes. And yes, there has been a drop...
  4. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    What's scary is to see those huge swings which occurred due to very slight long term changes in orbit/solar. The forcing effects due to current CO2 increases is a much stronger force and temps are rising much faster.
  5. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    You STILL don't get it! You are comparing apples and oranges. Predicting temperature will rise as GHG's increase is simple math and logic. It's climate science 101. It's predicting only the long term rate of increase. From NASA....... Atmospheric carbon dioxide performs a role similar to...
  6. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    Umm yes. You brainlessly repeat what you know are lies. I tell it like it is. You are a brainless parrot with no backbone.
  7. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    I'm not answering because it is the usual irrelevant red herring bullshit put up by the denier crowd when they have lost the real argument. If you don't understand the difference between weather and climate you are simply too stupid to intelligently discuss anything with. Predicting future...
  8. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    Give me a fucking break. Yeah CO2 levels and temps just happened to go up 40% right around the time when man started burning fossil fuels. What are you stupid? Forget the fact that isotope analysis DOES show the extra CO2 is from man, regardless of what denier propaganda you have read...
  9. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    Yes, but I don't repeat juvenile lies about people like you have on multiple occasions merely repeating untruths that others have said. Like some weak-willed parrot. You've done it with me repeating the lie that I am gay and you did it with BA saying what Max said about BA was true. Like he...
  10. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    There is no logic. Jerm is trying to say that CO2 in our atmosphere cools the planet. Only a total idiot would say such a thing. And of course you would find the truth about AGW painful. You are also an idiot.
  11. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    No it doesn't. You have no science showing CO2 cools the planet. It's akin to saying up is down. You are very fucked up.
  12. F

    Conservative Mind Set & Conspiracy Theories

    Yeah really. Looks like he has given up any pretense of fairness and honest commentary. He has fallen into the pit of offensive excrement that most of the other righties here wallow in.
  13. F

    Conservative Mind Set & Conspiracy Theories

    Max E Pad.........thinks his forum name is clever. Nuff said. :D
  14. F

    Conservative Mind Set & Conspiracy Theories

    That's funny. I see the same thing. I mean don't see the same thing. Thank goodness. What a tool.
  15. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    This guy even LOOKs like an asshole. So of course asshole jerm thinks his shit smells great. I'll go with the 97% of climate scientists and all the world's science orgs instead.
  16. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    Bastard eee is an idiot. Like you. So of course you think he is great. "Joe Bastardi is “the chief hurricane and long-range forecaster at AccuWeather and a national bodybuilding competitor.” I can’t speak to his physical strength but he bench-presses a staggering amount of anti-science...
  17. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    No you are wrong asshole Greenhouse gasses don't cool. You have no science. Only lies and bullshit. Saying greenhouse gasses cool is like saying up is down. You are fucked in the head.
  18. F

    Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate

    No you are wrong. CO2 leads temps, because it is a GHG. They are currently rising concurrently. Good to see that I taught you a new word though. here is more science proving AGW from NOAA, the world's best single source for climate data. Or maybe you think the French are better at it?
  19. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Counselor, your continued defense of your murderous defendant, even after he has been found guilty, is reason to believe that this case has driven you totally insane.
Back
Top