Search results

  1. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    CO2 is a greenhouse gas.
  2. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    And yes CO2 can and usually HAS lagged temperatures because as temps rise CO2 out gasses from the oceans. But in the past we were not dumping 9 billion tons of CO2 into the air from the burning of fossil fuels.
  3. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Here is the second chart showing CO2 leading temps higher............ because CO2 is a greenhouse gas and rising levels will raise temperature also. But jem cannot understand how that could happen from NOAA
  4. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Here is the first chart showing CO2 leading temperature as someone rational - leaves out jem - would expect since CO2 is a greenhouse gas. As levels of a GHG go up if all else is equal, then we would expect temps to go up. It's simple logic which jem still does not understand.
  5. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Fuck you I have never lied about anything I have written about AGW. Never. So fuck you you fucking lying prick. It does appear the paper is peer reviewed but with very lax criteria. I was wrong, not lying. The paper is irrelevant, poorly done, the authors are hacks who have been...
  6. F

    Why bother?

    Ahh ha ha ha ha ha.
  7. F

    Why bother?

    Because Paul is a whack job?
  8. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    I know !. This is what we really want to look at.
  9. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    No you're not. You are presenting a bullshit defective paper that would not pass peer review. What the paper is presenting has nothing to do with the over-all greenhouse effect. Also, you are simply wrong again, CO2 has been shown to lead temps and I have shown you the two charts proving...
  10. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    So what? You have been caught peddling lies again and now you are trying diversion. The essential thing is that CO2 levels a few feet over the oceans means shit and that's what your bullshit paper is measuring. How do you live with yourself being such a fucking liar? How can you justify...
  11. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Jem you crazed partisan liar I know the data is from NOAA.....so what? The CO2 levels in the troposphere are all that matters with regard to the greenhouse effect, not the levels a few feet above the surface of the ocean which this sham of a paper is measuring. You must be an idiot to...
  12. F

    Large Companies Prepared to Pay Price on Carbon

    No, it sounds like you are an idiot and that he wants to stick his head in the sand.
  13. F

    Large Companies Prepared to Pay Price on Carbon

    They say ignorance is bliss. I guess he's even happier now.
  14. F

    Large Companies Prepared to Pay Price on Carbon

    No, no real impact. And up is down. I guess these guys are in the conspiracy huh? American Geophysical Union "The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system — including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the...
  15. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    This the only CO2/ temperature relationship that matters. Anything else is noise. There is no significant variation in rate of change to even correlate a shorter term temp change with.
  16. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Yes, to protect my big government world view. Wow you are nuts. And funny you should mention deceptive lying-ass troll. You learned to do it so well. What part of marine boundary layer Co2 levels do you not understand? The levels of CO2 at the surface of the ocean are NOT...
  17. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    So if you read something in the Rupert Murdoch's NY Post's editorial section and you assume it's correct? I presume just the opposite and this article reaffirms why. Some questions for you gwb that address all the points in this piece of propaganda article. If you please. Do you think...
  18. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Jem you are so gullible and delusional. To get the delta they are using.... "globally averaged well-mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data". In other words they are measuring the CO2 levels at the surface of the oceans and are measuring, among other things, the biological effect on the...
  19. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    Well I know you like simple terms. No surprise there. No I am not a hypocrite and nothing that you so insanely pasted shows otherwise. Potty mouth? Shit, you have me there. Sorry if I offended your delicate senses. It is the stupidity and attacks by others that prompt such talk.
  20. F

    Not 97% but .3% of Climatologists agree.

    And you are seriously deluded by the Koch bros and company. Congratulations for being a good sheep.
Back
Top