As long as both major parties are paid for by the companies that use the labor, and as long as they continue to blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, it won't matter because it's not going to get fixed. That's the real issue, regardless of ideology.
I don't care what party the prez is from if he/she:
Honors the oath to abide by the constitution, doesn't dictate by executive fiat to navigate around the other branches of gov, want's to end the war on drugs, doesn't show favor of one religion over another, doesn't promote racism by...
So were they telling the truth about the incident being because of a video, or were they lying?
Post: Ricter, do you even care what the truth about Benghazi is? Or do you want to make sure Hillary remains unscathed so she can continue Obama's transformation in 2016?
Yes. Similar to Rubio's ideas, I thought. I did some searches earlier since I, as you, hadn't heard about wanting open borders, at least in the sense of illegal immigration. Not sure where libertarians stand on fencing the border, though.
When there is a cover up, there is a lie. You do know that, don't you? Do you believe that it was a protest over a film. That was the first lie. Once a lie is started, only further lying can continue the lie.
I don't know what the truth is. I only know that we don't know what it is...
"With all due respect, the fact is, we had four dead Americans! Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can...
That would make them libertarian, and the establishment hates them even more than they hate the left (probably sees them as a bigger threat to their status quo). I agree with your assessment, however.
I'm saying egalitarianism is an illusion and false hope. There can be no such society. You need a different equation for that where C is the elite and A,B are the have nots.
A=0 B=0 C>A+B.
C would have you believe A=B=C.
Yeah, I got that. I was essentially agreeing with him (with a bit of cynicism).
My point was we would all be equal...all with nothing...with the exception of the elite (I should have mentioned that...I thought that would be assumed in my comment).
I don't believe a true egalitarian...