Search results

by the way... look at the big names on the list... Immelt and Cook. both those guys are like kids who inherited the patriarchs work. What have they done since they took over? Cozy up to govt to sustain their position instead of innovating and continuing the big progress their companies use...

are we talking about pollution or co2. I believe in conserving the environment and we should limit destruction of resources and pollution to sustainable levels. co2 is not pollution.

if only climate change were real. we could then looking forward to a little warming and we know that means more greening and more food for a runaway population. instead there is not science showing man made co2 causes warming... so we really don't know what will happen.

the establishment plan for us is far worse than second fiddle. anything we can do to avoid the establishment plan gives our kids a chance. their plan is to take away as much economic might and freedom as possible. exiting these accords and not signing onto tpp is keeping our tax payers in the...

I could have taken offense at that remark as someone who goes to Catholic church... but I had to laugh. I don't think these guys get your anti pc humor.

there is page after page of this when you do a search on google. everyone in the world knows the state and national polls missed. except for tony and piezoe. I wonder who is paying them to be so dense? and I am sure if you click on one or two , you can go aha... but there is at least...

lol... you don't even comprehend or recognize your own argument. I was using word because it came your from your quote of the Mueller paper. I used the word "partially" because Mueller used it in his paper. I used it to avoid your anticipated troll tactic. wow... did your troll argument just...

here is my quote... I did not use the word completely... I used you word conclusively. the irony is even when trying to prove you are not a liar...you misrepresented things.

I stated you said "conclusively"... (i will bold and underline your use of the world below.) here is my proof... "Again, nobody is disputing that but what they are saying is that the current changes cannot be explained by natural cycles alone - that's what the Berkeley project was all...

that chart is not showing the recent drop in temps. for instance the satellites show a big recent drop... and most of the other charts show something similar...

you cited hillary clinton for proof... and we showed she got wrong before and made fun of your choice. people with integrity in your position would just shut up or laugh it off. instead you go into full steam douche. And? She is not 'thinking' of running again, there is ZERO evidence for...

you have no integrity.... you acted like you had science and you overstated what you think you had... you said he proved it was co2 conclusively... it was a model troll ... that is not scientific proof. its not conclusive. by the way anthropogenic does not mean man made co2 causes warming...

now you got it. see how much easier it is when you provide a link... so we can actually discuss the science and you can learn how you mis represented everything important. your explanation just showed Mueller in deed relied on a model contrary to your post above... his findings do not rule...

troll ass wipe.... I posted that link the last time we had this discussion and above in this thread. now tell us which paper supports the statement you made. I want to read the paper. so I can see if it stands for anything with respect to man made co2. "Four of our papers have undergone...

post the paper you low integrity troll. don't change the argument post the paper that backs op your claims.... we are curious to see if you were telling the truth or lying agian.

we concluded hillary kiled seth rich as a fact? why are you lying about the seth rich discussion. the discussion was about whether fox news claimed to have federal law enforcement sources. They did make that claim. Even if they then retracted the argument. They did make the claim. That...

what are you hiding show us the link to the paper. lets see it. these posts undergo extensive scrutiny... that is the type of b.s. statement politicians run with. not credible academics. credible academics point to real data and publications in respected peer reviewed journals. your team...

what should impress you is that there is not one peer reviewed paper stating man made co2 is causing warming. that was not relying on now failed models. yet there are myraid peer reviewed studies indicating the sun the tides, ocean temps, aerosols, clouds and may other natural factors impact...

here is their list of papers... I do not see anything like what you are talking about.. http://berkeleyearth.org/papers/

give us the link... is it a real peer reviewed journal or the pay one that has been cited as a fraud by academics. what does the paper say about man made co2.