Search results

you are a master at eroding decency for the sake of the left. you seem to be implying that because secrecy is sometimes a problem... hillary's criminal or close to criminal activities should be allowed? So is that what you are saying? because you believe top secret classifications can...

I am not sure this was directed at me... but I what wrote was said in jest. If Trump is guilty, I hope they get him. But, I hope every other crooked sob in the swamp goes to jail to.

how can you call that chart fake news. Without telling us the data is fake or the calculations are wrong, you comment is idiotic. Its not fake news just because you don't like it. The evidence is there on the chart. That is the news. Now... examine the chart and the data. What is fake is...

why did at least one of those organizations state or very strongly imply Trump was under criminal investigation when he was not? (The point I was making in a sarcastic manner) by the way I already proved this too you.. why are you such a troll? ==== "very first search result I clicked on.. is...

but... if the WaPo or NYT were to simply say they had sources saying Comey is now being investigated. The media could then act like it was true for the next 6 months. And we could get a special counsel investigating Comey and then later the Special Counsel.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-10/men-and-republicans-are-the-best-tippers Hoping to get a good tip? Seek out the table with the most conservative men from New England. A new survey finds men, Republicans, and residents of the northeast are the best tippers. Women tip a median...

the house freedom caucus is frequently the only group preventing the establishment from completely ignoring the voters. without them the republicans would probably not make good on any of their campaign promises.

that video that I posted was at the hearing... its not out of context. your quotes... if in context are actually repulsive... its revolting that it came from the head of the FBI. it shows comey to be a clown or complicit. why the hell should comey be volunteering Hillary's knowledge or state...

i did not realize this committee destroyed comey and clinton this seriously.

for it to be argumentum ad populum I would have to be making a fallacious argument and appealing to the whole world as if to say that makes it true. 1. it is not fallacious. comey told the world of her crimes and then he created an improper intent element to explain why he did not want to see...

you post bullshit. I disabuse you of it and then you come back with more bullshit. I am tired of wasting my time... The whole world knows Hillary is an "non-prosecuted" criminal and traitor... so far.

you need to stop cutting and pasting dnc bullshit. privilege does not extend to cover ups of crimes. illegal classified info would not be protected. a lawyer would have to work with a judge to find ways to protect the privileged and legal info from the illegal classified info.

your response is preposterous for myraid reasons. besides mills was not a low level aid and why would you give immunity when you can just subpoena the evidence http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/440370/why-did-obama-justice-department-grant-cheryl-mills-immunity

just as you should be careful of everything the establishment and soros tell you. Particularly soros. so far the only major figures who I trust to give us a solid view of things is Rand Paul (and Cruz on domestic issues). and even with them its trust but verify.

In part because the crooked SOB Comey gave Mills and others immunity and then let them destroy the evidence. This is so unprecedented for a head prosecutor... it had to have been crooked. The DOJ may or may not be doing something about it. We don't know as far as I have read.

the irony. the reason why comey ran a blocking scheme for hillary and staff was exactly that. precedence... not the word you meant to use. How many times have I told you, you never get the law correct. prec·e·dence ˈpresədəns,prēˈsēdns/ noun the condition of being considered more...

which is why I said present the links. You really need to step up the integrity. You know damn well that post was said in fun and it was on the same page as this post. The template I chose for pretty much the entire thread that year - projected an Obama victory... "as I posted on another...

this is the article... drudge has a link to it. https://www.circa.com/story/2017/07/09/politics/russian-lawyer-who-got-inside-donald-trumps-inner-circle-had-been-denied-us-visa Another player in the Russian influence scandal, the U.S.-based political firm Fusion GPS, was also involved in...

nice try. but wrong. drudge links to articles it does not create fake news... cnn does.

you are going to have to back that statement up with links to the quotes in context. 1. regarding Romney --- Obama won by 7 in 2008. 53 to 46 Obama won by 4 in 2012. here is what I said on ET on Nov. 5th --- in 2012 about polls and templates... and I got it 100 percent on the money in terms...