Search results

Arguing is over Debate is over http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability YOU are over.... You let me know when you've had enough

See from my point of view it looks like you enjoy the verbal ass whippin..Keep commin..I got plenty here for you..heh heh http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability

You haven't kept up with current events I was right and YOU were ASS BACKWARDS WRONG and each time you say that I will refer to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability and each time another person here will read that and then check your bullshit responses and say to...

How long do you think it will take for folks to read the thread and see your perfomance? "your wrong" "you don't get probability" "its always 50%" "Thats not a typo" "I won the debate" Ooops!!! Yep that math mistake sure is embarrassing...How will I ever live that down...

Yeah except that you will probably get the order ASS BACKWARDS WRONG

Still can't find your balls. Maybe they are under your bed? Here repeat after me...."Yes, it was my mistake, I thought I was right, I insisted that I WAS right, but in the end well, it turns out that I was ASS BACKWARDS WRONG"... I do want to apologize for suggesting the new handle It...

As it turns out, you are STILL ass backwards wrong.... even though I made an "embarrassing" mistake, you are still ass backwards wrong.... One might argue that Wikipedia is wrong, AND I am wrong or one might come to the conclusion that YOU are ASS BACKWARDS WRONG.... YOU WANT TO TALK...

I'm not feeling too stressed you see as it turns out, your commentary was ass backwards wrong.... :D

Yes Wayne, that is in fact my approach. Now there is only one reason for me to continue with this and that is to show how you go from a theoretical understanding to the practical application In order to do that you have to add risk management (stop loss calc) and betting or more accurately...

Yes Wayne, that is in fact my approach. Now there is only one reason for me to continue with this and that is to show how you go from a theoretical understanding to the practical application In order to do that you have to add risk management (stop loss calc) and betting or more accurately...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability ---------------------------------------------------------- Here is a quote from Wikipedia...While it isn't the last word its good enough for this crowd; "To give a mathematical meaning to probability, consider flipping a "fair" coin. Intuitively...

Yes you did (lose), you were wrong at the outset and you continue to be wrong...insisting doesn't make you right it just makes you ignorant

I didn't lose the debate, just my temper... This is the way I speak and post.. I suggest you put me on ignore..I will do the same for you.. Steve

I will let you know what is and what isn't a typo.. and since you insist on acting like a prick, let me recommend that you go find a book and read up on variance, monte carlo methods and anything else that you need to get you back on track...Finally and for good measure.. Go fuck...

Yes you continue to harp on the fact that I made a mistake..Thats the kind of thing that child does...I've posted here a lot and each time I made a mistake I said so..To me it matters not whether it was a typo or sloppy math, either way it is a mistake and I am responsible... Now that we have...

You know that kind of comment doesn't show much character.. You have very little to say about the subject, and a lot to say about a simple mistake... As you can see we are substantially different kinds of folks. You have a wonderful life.. Steve

You know I am wrong occasionally. I do make mistakes. Certainly that was my typo And yet one has to wonder how it is that you can't understand that runs occur, but they cannot occur unless the intervening steps are in place...A run of 5 can't occur unless there have been 4 previous...

You are correct, my typo

Correct and back to the example.. If you ask me to bet on a series of events and you give me odds (which is what you are doing when you propose that out of a series of 5 flips, three "heads have already come up). If I have only to see two more such events, if the risk/reward is suitable I...

If they are "all 50%" why are the payoffs different (roulette)? The payoffs in Roulette vary from 35 to1 down to 1 to 1. Why the difference if it is "all 50%"