Search results

Yeah, so long as there's a smart nonbullshitter in charge. "If We Have Actionable Intelligence About High-Value Terrorist Targets And President Musharraf Won't Act, We Will." -- Barack Hussein Obama, August 1, 2007 :cool:

+1

History 101: BUSH WANTED TO INVADE IRAQ. He had a hard-on for Saddam, not for Osama. So if you nuke the guy who is excuse numero uno for invading Iraq ("they wuz collaboratin' wid Al-Kaiduh!"), you pretty much nuke your excuse for invading Iraq. Not to mention nuking the "Coalition of...

Incorrect. Indicators are based on past AND PRESENT data. If you look at a trend indicator that includes the latest datum, you're looking at the current trend, not historical trend. "The best evidence that a market is going to go up is that it's already doing so. The best evidence that a...

Bush went into Afghanistan because he had to. He then diverted most resources into a senseless invasion and occupation of Iraq because he wanted to. We lost all the ground we had won in Afghanistan and basically had to start all over again. Nobody's dumber than you rightbots, either in...

Your braindead conspiracy theory is duly noted. :D

Upside risk is an oxymoron.

Yes you are. Quasi-random means only partly random. In the case of the market, the randomness is a variable over time that ranges from overwhelming to virtually nonexistent. It comes and goes. YOU act as if it is always present and will always nullify any entry strategy that seeks to go with...

Somebody offers you a coin flip bet: if you lose, you lose your bet; if you win, you win double your bet. The coin is unbiased. You clearly have an edge. Will you go all in and bet your life savings? If not, why not?

And notice the bait-and-switch surf loves to engage in. He admits the market is only quasi-random when backed into a corner, but then he'll insist you only have a 50% chance of having a correct entry because the market is actually fully random! No telling when or if he'll ever stop trying to...

Momentum: a derivative of price that never lags price. Enjoy the ignorance and stubbornness your OTA training has trapped you in.

Ignorance is bliss. :)

No, Jurik's MA is adaptive. I specified nonadaptive for precisely that reason. Nor am I talking about any other blackbox MA; I know the formula. And once again you've failed to answer the question.

We'll never find out because you refuse to simply answer the question. I honestly think you won't answer because it is so embarrassing for you. Nobody is expecting you to reveal secret techniques, just a broad description of what nonpublic trading knowledge if any that you were taught. For...

2000 posts over a six-year period is hardly an obsession. Not that I expect you to be capable of doing the math. :D I never said anything about everything being available "for free". What I've learned certainly wasn't free, it cost me years of research and I won't be disclosing it to the...

Speaking strictly for myself, I wouldn't use tinkertoy indicators like CCI or MACD, having moved beyond them to something more advanced. And if I was being charged kilobucks for trader training and somebody started wasting my time with losers like MACD, I'd be PISSED. :mad: Levels? You mean...

What is the basis of the graph you posted? It doesn't look real, especially the numbers on the vertical axis.

And as pointed out, all paying the maximum gets you is the "opportunity" to develop your own system yourself (as if you can't do that anyplace else, at anytime and for virtually no expenditures). That way, when you fail, you have no one to blame but yourself. This crap was spawned in Scam...

You like to make partial claims and give distorted impressions. What you failed to mention was Van Tharp's exit strategy, which was anything but random. More importantly you fail to mention (and perhaps even to realize) that while one may be able to still be "profitable" after compromising...

Thanks for the info. Is it safe to assume that you're talking about the 40-bar EMA of closing price?