Search results

You're not making sense. You haven't even explained what "it" is. Trace WHAT back to Trump? The avoidance of a war? I trace the escalation back to a lame-duck with NO REGARD for the views of the incoming. Also, one WHAT can only hope? One IDIOT who wants to start a war?

No the real question is, what did your dear friend and comrade Maxine Waters know, and when did she know it? For example, when did she know that Russia invaded Korea? Now she knows Russia hacked Limpopo elections.

Like i've said, i think its probable Trump approved of the call either before, or after. Tell, me, what is wrong with back-door diplomacy that de-escalates a needless hot war based on the deceptions and revenge of an out-going administration? Your attitude is synonymous with the left-winged...

Flynn had every right to suggest that sanctions would be re-examined, if not rolled back when the new administration takes over. It's called de-escalation, and/or actual diplomacy. You think all this Russiaphobia (paranoia) is justified? You think it's ok for an outgoing President to start a...

Wrong. He didn't lie. Has everything to do with intel eavesdropping, leaking, and how the leak was SPUN. Insiders Attempt To Overturn The Election With Attack On Flynn https://amgreatness.com/2017/02/13/insiders-attempt-overturn-election-attack-flynn/

Cernovich's case in writing: https://www.dangerandplay.com/2017/02/13/what-general-flynns-resignation-means/

Somebody in intel with a political ax to grind had access to a transcript of Flynn's call and leaked it to press...which then circled the prey looking to drive a wedge. It seems the press is not revealing the transcript. If they did, it would prove someone in intel was spying on the transition...

Cernovich had a lot to say about this, and i tend to agree.

At some point, liberality became mainly associated with fiscal liberality, in order to BUY A BASE OF VOTERS. Now, so far down that slippery and fraudulent slope, they are known as "left", "far left", and most notably "globalist". The mask has come off. It no longer stands for altruism at all.

There are priorities. If Snowden is prioritized, as if he was a treasonous monster that needed to be tried and imprisoned for life immediately, it would split Trumps base, demoralize half of his vocal supporters, and discourage everyone who stood in line for his rally's chanting "Lock her up"...

These are aspects of the phenomenon of faith, which is the essence of sorcery and witchcraft. First faith, then "attraction", then "manifestation": MAGICK. In a world of knowledge, ignorance is occult. In a world of ignorance, knowledge is occult. Since there is no room for faith in a world...

There's a book out there, "Think and Grow Rich". There's even a video called "The Secret". Beyond that, the accumulation of wealth is probably more related to connections/network/family and aptitude/IQ. However, it's also been shown that given a bit of mind training, one can get a step...

I would generally agree with the definition of sorcery here, but would include the god-of-this-world as chief sorcerer. Yes, the god that makes the birds, bees and trees...is involved in just the sorts of things you describe. Yes, it's the art of influencing change, to impose a will other than...

My version of predestination does let everybody off the hook, freeing all the "slaves to sin". But my version of salvation is very different than Calvin or Augustine. In my version of salvation, the only thing being saved is Christ. This means that no people will be saved. No Jews, no...

Yes he should get Snowden because, at every Trump rally they were all chanting "Lock him up. Lock him up". (meaning Snowden). So, Trump is just keeping a campaign issue.

Go back to watching Colbert monologues and let him figure it out for you.

The popular vote is in favor of Trump's ban.

Screw your satire and the source that you are parroting.

Shouldn't call it immigration anymore. Should be called human trafficking.

Oh i get it. It was just a cutsie trendy meaningless little comeback that hasn't anything to do with the topic of this thread, which is judicial scope in regards to immigration. While i don't know your stance, i detect some memory of some things Trump has said, and some resentment about...