Search results

Let's now entertain your objections for arguments sake. Since you are not Canadian or Brit, so you say, you are not a hypocrite, siding with Mooler against Russian social media influencers. But if you were Canadian or Brit, you would be a hypocrite. Yes?

You're saying being Canadian, living in the UK is like being a cuck? I didn't make that comparison, but I have noted how the UK, formerly the leading colonial supremacist in the world, has bowed down to Islamic, worldwide colonialistic supremacy, political, ideological, and cultural.

General question: Do the authors of threads have more time to delete posts?

If I didn't, it's because I underestimated your perniciousness.

Yep. Looks like you have used the time to edit to delete.

You have said it. A search will confirm that, unless you have used the time given to edit posts to delete it.

Interesting. The auto speller on my phone automatically turns ad hominEM into ad hominum. So I'll note your objection as ad hominum in itself, and/or more evidence of your dripping pernicious British supremacy. Or rather, your Islamic sense of supremacy currently aided by legacy latent...

I've never said my father is a pimp or my mom is a prostitute, but you have said you are a Canadian living in the UK. The pernicious sense of supremacy is obvious, ranking down our trailer parks, while ranking up your no-go zones.

Sounds like insincere garbage to me. Opening and closing with ad hominum arguments makes a garbage sandwich when you consider the actual contents of the argument. Where is the beef?

Once again you have sidestepped the obvious hypocrisy involved in cheerleading for Moooler, while trolling US political influence circles as a foreigner, and/or an unregistered foreign agent who makes a full time job out of trolling waters rich with US voters. What you are doing here is against...

No if it was up to me foreign trolls would be allowed into the US political influence game. It's only when foreign trolls hypocritically try to exclude other foreign trolls that I believe the hypocrites should be excluded by the laws or logic they are hypocritically supporting. You support...

So you plan to rely on an ad hominum approach, rather than countering the points I've made? Wanting things both ways is what dual standards are about. That's not what this gesture was about.

I opened with the contrast between mountains and molehills. I think Trump's gesture AFTER receiving the almost meaningless medal from the sickly King of an even sicker country was a mistake. It was asymetrical, and not a response to any prior, similar gesture. For that, the Saudi Kink should...

Unlike bowing, which is a gesture of respect that always involves rank, saluting is a gesture of respect that could involve rank, but which could be a recognition of equality, especially when reciprocated. Equality is what America is about, rather than the pernicious supremacy of states of old...

Just as you are misrepresenting a taller Trump facilitating the reception of some honorary medal from a smaller, weaker King of an Islamic state, you are misrepresenting the North Korean salute of an American civilian president during diplomacy. And you, as a Brit, are misrepresenting just how...

Then it would also be an incredible disrespect to the North Korean soldiers to see their general salute the American president. This was a reciprocated gesture of diplomacy, maintaining, at worst, a posture of equality, avoiding the appearance of supremacy. That is quite different from...

Saluting political Islam with policy, policing, and dual standards is a mountain. Saluting a North Korean general after the general salutes you is a molehill. Reciprocity is an integral component of diplomacy.

Nope just a counter intel op to identify a leaker

나는 모하메드의 꼭두각시를 발견했다.

Must be a great day for Canada too, as Frederick Foreslight and exGOPer liked your post.