Search results

lol from your lips to mr. market's ears...

Agreed...a lot of gratitude in order

Thanks, ammo. This is interesting...

Yes, I see them...and the question stands. Historical price action did not occur during a period of unprecedented liquidity. This sugar high will take us wherever it takes us, 2007/08 retracement levels be damned

Why is everybody looking to short this?

I was wondering the same thing...

and i didn't mean that as a question about your comment. :p

wtf?

NQ/YM succumbing. ES fighting it what does this tell you?

Even more important question: why does it have to?

I believe I said "nearly at random," but close enough.

I didn't complain that PnF lacked complexity. I complained that it of lacked nuance. Sorta like your response:D

1965-2005 keep meaning to add the last four years

my excel spreadsheet

Tomorrow is, statistically, the most bullish day of the year. Positive 74% of the time. So, I guess following today's big UP day with another big UP day is the new normal ...

Ah. Well, in that case, have the big boys decreed that 1125 is now support?

Curious -- Why is previous price action at this level insufficient as a reference point? Especially when it's so recent? Have you found a date change to be that consequential? Thanks

Why?

This thread is quiet today. Shock and awe?