Search results

I assume nothing. I see an increase in once eradicated diseases that coincides with an increase in illegals, especially young illegals entering the country, some being verified as carriers by border patrol. You can check vaccine records of everyone on every flight, but not everyone coming in...

Or just those without visas, and those entering illegally. The border patrol agents who have contracted or been exposed to a variety of diseases all but eradicated from this country would like that idea.

My point is we can't check many of illegals regarding vaccinations, especially since we don't know who or where many of them are. And regarding those who want illegal immigration, I really don't think it matters. I apply that to both parties. It will only matter if their kids get sick.

As we should with every illegal we find, since we're going to let them stay? (And allow the young ones to attend schools with our own young ones who may not have been exposed to these once removed illnesses from our country). Or should they get special treatment, you know, like they do by...

And no man in the GOP will speak out against the first woman prez, which might very well be Hillary if Romney is atop the ticket again.

Which makes them look like fools to those of us who don't watch.

I stopped watching him when I realized he thinks he knows everything about everything and has every solution to every problem. That is a left wing politician's trait, even though O'reilly claims to be independent.

I would settle for tar and feathers.

Establishment repubs love big gov as much as the left. That's one of the primary reasons their hatred for small gov movements is only rivaled by dems. The only difference I see between them and the left is they seem a little less desirous to control every individual's action regarding...

Ain't he the guy who interfered in our Florida politics last election because he was opposed to a medical maryjane initiative?

We, the peasants...

Holy shit! I've agreed with you and db in one day! :D

I am in agreement with you on this point. Seems to be a human trait to not always accept what our eyes tell us when it challenges bias. Not just politics, either. Happens in trading all the time. :eek:

Actually, I think the constitution is the answer to that. I'm not convinced that either party is much interested in following that anymore. That brings me back to Carson. I don't care about his religious beliefs. I care that he will follow the constitution.

Yeah. Truth is a bitch if you're a left winger. Something blinds you to it.

That's called tyranny in some circles. Or as I said...my way or the highway. Obama should be as willing to work with the right as he wishes they would be with him. He is not, and you deceive yourself if you think otherwise. How many veto's were promised during state of the union? He is...

Oh. I read Ricter incorrectly then.

Apparently Obama didn't get the memo...after the actions of the left wing super majority ended. Or maybe they just weren't acting the way he wanted them to. Actually, there is no maybe to it.

"If congress won't act, I will". That sounds a little like "My way or the highway". That throws mud in the face of a 3 branch system. I would not consider that responsible governing either.