Search results

TM: >Throw a baseball on earth, throw one on >the moon, and throw one into space.....will >the results be the same? Obviously not. Are you presenting this as evidence that a baseball isn't accompanied by a gravitational field? If so, right or wrong you have connectivity issues. >In...

ART: >Apparently some people don't know the >difference between mass and gravitation >fields Me: >And you apparently have a reading >comprehension problem. ART: >Ad hominem. Not in the least...your reading comprehension problem is the apparent reason for your flawed...

ART: >Apparently some people don't know the >difference between mass and gravitation >fields And you apparently have a reading comprehension problem. (and a real problem stating the obvious in science and believing it's news) JB

ART: >Bodies do not create the gravity >within the gravitational field. Of course not. That is why sometime when the earth is here, the gravitational force that often accompanies it ends up over there. Man I hate when that happens JB

ART: >Mass is not dependent on gravity for its existence. Wow. That's news to me -- NOT! And I was certain mass couldn't survive weightlessness. I mean satellites just go poof when they get into space don't they? JB PS. Where do you get this earth shattering information from...

ART: >Some people have trouble with the >concept of highest. And some people aim low and delude themselves into believing that IS the highest. JB

ART: >they remained in mystery and wonder of >what is ultimate reality Yeah, I'm always wondering what moves god. I mean, it all ending with him is just a matter of perspective after all. Seems pretty shallow and naive to think that it all stops there. JB

Mav: >Two-thirds of California residents want marriage to >remain between a man and a woman, one man says >he is above the law, and that man happens to be the >Mayor (of San Francisco). >This is incomprehensible and hypocritical. >In Alabama, Judge Roy Moore lost his job because he...

ART: >Science is limited, it doesn't reveal anything >but limited facts and limited truths. Wow, that's the revelation of the century. Now that this is out I guess we should just imagine what is real and what is right. Science sure can't help us after all. JB

ART: >Probably "aced" his college class too Ad Hominem :) JB PS. I'm a simple minded individual who never went to high school nor even graduated from the eight grade.

ART: >Until you find the cause of gravity, you are >just scientifically guessing. Me: >You must not know the cause to know that it's there. ART: >Non sequitur Bullshit ART (or shall I say Bullshit ARTist). To burn my finger I need not even know a surface is hot, let alone need...

ART: >Prove that matter causes gravity. You can't, >no one has been able to prove it. I will as soon as you provide a link to a post where I made that assertion. JB PS. This ART "assertion attribution out of thin air" deal feels familiar somehow. LOL

ART: >So you trust your own personal experience >with God, yet reject others and their personal >experience with God? Perhaps you should ask me what I reject or accept rather than telling me. Naw...that would be like you. Never mind. JB

>Until you find the cause of gravity, you are >just scientifically guessing. You must not know the cause to know that it's there. JB

ART: >By what means can a limited intellect, limited >senses, limited relativistic logic gain proof of the >assertions I make of God? By the means that any god worth half a crap would have given me, that's how. JB

ART: >A baseball has no gravity whatsoever. BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ... Wrong answer but thanks for playing. JB

ART: >God by definition is Absolutely Powerful, Absolutely >Potent, and exists at all possible times in all possible >places. >You can imagine that if your imagination works >properly. OK, I can imagine your assertion. Now support it. JB

ART: >Can you imagine absolute impotence? >If you can, think of the absolute opposite >value of that. Was someone asking for a definition or how to imagine omnipitence ART? I don't thing so. I was asking Aphex if we wished to support the assertion that god has it, that's all. Pay...

LS: >One definitive quality that we can analyze. >just ONE! Aphex: >Omnipotence Ok, you presented it for analyzation. Can you support it? JB

>How could you use the scientific method to observe >something that sets the bar for all that is observable? >Do you understand what I am asking? Clearly before venturing further in this conversation, a definition of your god would be in order. I cannot hope to engage in any sort of...