Search results

>"I can't be covered ART, it's in the record." Sorry ART. Clearly confusing. The "I" should be an "It". Now the statement when read in context will make sense. JB PS. And I edited the "I" to an "It" in that post. Thanks for pointing it out.

Such gibberish to cover up for a fabrication. It can't be covered ART, it's in the record. Of course, what else would we expect from ART(ist). JB

Arch: >No serious religious scholar suggests Genesis was >intended to be read literally. ROFLAO...and I suppose YOU decide who is "serious" and who isn't. There are countless respected scholars who take Genesis to be absolutely literal. Roberk: >I think the allegorical interpretations...

ART(ist) >That this was not clear to you, or that you see some >point to "sieze" on is curious. The point siezed is that you accused me of misquoting. I proved by the record for all to see that I didn't misqoute you in ANY way. You simply made a mistake in your accusation and thought...

I LIKED IT!!!!!! And I'll buy the sequel. JB

ART: >Making an argument on the basis of a misquote (especially >if the misquote is intentional) is usually the work of a hack >who will dismiss the accepted form of argumentation in >favor of fabrication to support some agenda having nothing >to do with the argument or statement in...

>AS YOU CAN SEE from the posted article--gay marriage >is simply wrong. gays are not wrong, but gays being >sanctioned by the state is very very very bad. WAKE >UP and smell the TRUTH Sorry Jack Wabbit -- just because some guy with a radio show thinks it's true doesn't make it so. JB

Alfonso: >Actually, it's quite an apt example, Turok. Because it >illustrates quite clearly that homosexually activity arises. Sure, if you have no interest as to WHY the activity arises (which apparently you are not or you wouldn't consider it a apt example). You seem to make no...

LongShot makes a point about maturing into adults and putting childish myths behind: >a child matures into an adult and realizes that santee >claus and easter bunny are fairy tales. perhaps we >atheists have also matured... ART(ist) responds directly with the assertion that parents...

Me: >Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time. TM: >DO you really think you can taunt me? interesting...... >ok the game is on. Clearly ignorant of pop culture as well. JB

Know perfectly well how to use it... I just don't find it the best tool for use. And now how do you feel cause you sure looook stupid. JB

ART: >Ridicule is a common method used by flamers when >they lack effectiveness to generate arguments that >stand on their own merit. There were plenty of valid points in there and you just choose ti ignore them. Let's start with the "Parents know that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny...

row: >what else would you expect for our berk ART? ART: >Ad hominem. ART is even pretending to be so stupid that he thinks rows comments were actually a point of argument rather than a simple comment to surrounding participants. At best it could be called "poisening the well"...

TM: >but now you come trolling in with nothing to offer >but insults and aggressive attacks agianst ART It has already been established that you either just pretend to be dumb or don't have the intellect to differentiate between valid points and insults (in another example, ignorance is not...

ART: >Parents know that Santa Claus and the Easter >Bunny are imaginary to begin with. Not true...I think GG is right, ART can't be this stupid. A parent who knows that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny to be imaginary are merely children who grew up and realized the truth and...

>You can tell with your eye what the significant swings >are no a chart. Coming up with rules to capture them >should not be too difficult. If it's not difficult to come up with the rules then accomplish that and the programming is relatively easy. (I think you may be underestimating the...

Jem: >Finally the population argument or unwanted life >argument is not a big winner with me. I think we a >really talking about the proper use and distribution >of our planet's resources. You respond to an argument that I did not make. I said: >It's teaching are *consistently*...

>(By the way I am not saying you must agree with >the Catholic churches teachings on sex, I am just >saying their views are well reasoned and consistent). Without more thought I will not challenge the "consistent" part of your statement -- perhaps the Catholic teachings are consistent...

Alphonso: >After all the research and just plain bullshit misinformation >that tries to ping homosexuality on genetics, it is just plain >obvious that certain environments increase the likelihood >of homosexual behavior to emerge. Long term prison inmates >for example. That is an...

ART: >If a scientist allows his subjective belief systems >to influence his empirical conclusions, then the >conclusions reached are not scientific by >definition. Yes if course...but that doesn't stop you from continually *calling* the contaminated results "scientific". It's a game...