Search results

>Thoughts? Sound. Very sound. JB

Papst: >The subject of an investigation has a right to lie, >stonewall, not self incriminate. I recognize that you were making a "you're world" statement there and thus my next statement isn't meant to educate you. "The subject of an investigation has a A. right to lie, (I don't...

Wag: >Ferrari has decided to play it "safe" and go for an >"evolved" version of their 2003 mount, while McLaren >and BMW have totally started from scratch with new >cars and are dealing with a tremendous learning curve. Yes, but that learning curve *may* yield results that Maranello...

From article: >Consider the arbitrary nature of the charges against >Stewart, which include the non-crime of "insider trading." >The initial accusation against Stewart was that she was >tipped by her broker that ImClone executives were selling >the company's stock. This "inside...

I would have just sed that I should have spent longer in grade school. JB

Post question to the "Feedback" section rather than to "chit chat" and I'll bet you'll get an answer. JB

>I wouldn't believe everything you hear in >the press - nor comment on it ad nauseum......... Hey, Harry has to have something to do between watching endless taped re-runs of the spoof "we didn't go to the moon" movie that he thinks is real. JB...

>These two paragraphs kind of contradict each >other. Why wouldnt you get rid of your losers and >put your money in the stocks you mention in the >first paragraph? And that is the question several have asked. His response to me was that one (the still rising stock exited at 15% profit)...

Mvic just covered what I was writing, while I was writing it so I'll keep it short. If one is pulling out if a rising stock at 15% winnings because there are better opportunities elsewhere, why in the world would on stay in a stock that is falling and has been in the red for what...weeks...

>To me its clear (sorta like... well duh) because I've >taken the time to read, while others who argue >the point usually haven't bothered. I know many who have taken the time to not only read, but study and they still come to vastly differing conclusions regarding the right to bear arms...

Cd: >If I'm understanding you correctly then, you feel the >Constitution is clear about the right to bear "arms", No, I don't believe that the Consititution is clear on this point. My personal interpretation of the ambiguities however IS clear. I believe that the Constitution allows (not...

Cd:L >Why is it that you feel the Constitution is not clear >about the right to bear arms? First my position is that the framers intended for the general populace to have the right to weapons. I don't personally buy into the argument that it was only intended for those in some organized...

>It used to be quite a pain in the neck to download more >than a year or so intraday. They didn't have any mechanism >enabling you to pick a particular point in time. You always >had to back up from the most recent point. Did they >finally "invent" something to improve on this? I am a...

ART: >The terms "justly" and "reasonably" are subjective and >lacking in exactness. >They are subject to interpretation. Perfect example ART. Where's AAA? JB

Cd: >As to your question concerning "liberty". The following >is taken directly from Black's Law Dictionary from which >definitions are taken when establishing law. Cd, I really don't have an argument with you as I am quite familiar with the role of Blacks (partnered with an IP attorney...

ART to AAA: >As an exercise, post something you think is >clear, and I might show you that it is subject >to interpretation. I'll also throw one (or two or three) to AAA: From the Constitution: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on...

In addition to Aaron's suggestions, I would browse the WL site and cruise through the code of the scripts posted by users. I have learned an unbelievable number of tricks and capabilities there. JB

AAA: >The point cd is making, very well I might add, >is that interpreting the Constitution should not >be a subjective exercise. What is the point of even >having a Constitution that can mean vastly different >things, depending on who is doing the interpreting? ART: >Since when...

I did the same thing with an RX7 years ago and had a blast. Started with the autocross thing and went from there as you describe. Won my last race at Sears Point. If you have the bucks it's a blast. I eventually went to karts because of the better bang per buck for me, but I have nothing...

>Here is your formula for turning $100,000 into >$48 million, Michael Steinhardt style: >snip< >2. And you do this at a 30% average annual >rate every year for 28 years. Don't know if this is your math or his, but if you start with $100,000 and average 30% per year for 28 years you...