Search results

ART: >The genuinely faithful are too busy practicing their own >faith to waste time in the judgment of others and their >respective belief systems. ART, by your logic you just eliminated yourself from the "genuinely faithful" group. By stating a condition that one must meet to be...

>Turok, what is your point. I am not a fish >expert nor a drug expert, never said I >was Well, that IS my point. Many of your statements that you present as fact are not even REMOTELY fact and in FACT are not even solid opinions that you can support when challanged. Once again a Mav...

Mav, you really should be more careful -- you're careless, blabbering style makes such an easy target. In an exchange centered around a careless overstatement you defend it with an even MORE careless and ignorant overstatement. From this post...

>Well I am no expert but I have friends that spend >more then $500 on weed alone in a month let alone >a year. Ok, that explains it all. Never mind. JB

Mav: >I have no idea, you tell me. I don't know either but I'll bet we can agree on a ~ number. Pick one for conversation... A. $50 B. $100 C. $200 D. $500 JB

Ok Mav, On average, how much would you guess that the average drug user spends per year on product? Remember, we are not talking about only the addict who steals to support the habit, but also the Silicon Valley programmer who lights a blunt or passes the pipe once or twice a year on a...

LOL. I'm not an athiest and have never stated such. You are a hoot Row. JB

So, you believe there are more people involved in the drug trade than there are drug users? JB

Mav: >This is where I am laughing at your logic because >you are making the assumption that all crack dealers >are shot or will eventually be shot. I make NO SUCH ASSUMPTION. In fact I disagree with YOUR assumption ... You can't produce a post where I make that assumption. Please...

Mav: >When I was talking about the crack dealer I >never said every crack dealer gets shot or >even most of them. I was simply saying that >buying drugs has a consequence to other >people. False, what you said was... Mav: >Your need to get high probably got one person >killed...

GG: >do you think a muslim suicide bomber gets 72 >virgins when he blows himself up? ART: >I have no idea. Spect8or: >Lol! > >Yeah, you have no idea...... riiiiight. > >As if any sane person's response to this isn't "BUUUULSHIIIIIT"! I find it no more insane to believe in...

Me: >And the dude that got shot providing crack for person >"A" would have been shot providing crack the next day >for person "B" even if "A" hadn't bought it so the time of >death is only a day different. >Hey, it's your logic. Mav: >No, this isn't correct. You are making the...

Mav: >Well, both are facts. Catching a fish right before a >shark eats it is only changing the time of death by >a few minutes. And the dude that got shot providing crack for person "A" would have been shot providing crack the next day for person "B" even if "A" hadn't bought it so the...

Row: >...HA HA HA suckers,... Row: >I hope you see my logic. Oh, I see your logic alright. JB

Nice post. After seeing how hot the "bubble" is at this point, I have concluded the same. JB

>Why anyone would spend $800k on a fixer >upper dump is beyond me. Because it's surrounded by 1.5 million dollar houses and by popping 300k more in it you get it to that value. Buying the worst house in the neighborhood and throwing money and sweat into it can yield excellent dividends...

Row: >I'm aware of other NPOs taking advantage of their >tax situations and yes it isn't honorable, but even if >I ever took advantage of my executive position, which >I haven't, I will still have contributed more than you. >Probably more than you ever will, or am I wrong? Let's just...

Doubter: >This type of action threatens the future of the >entire NP field which is very self centered and >shortsighted of our "friend". I with you. There is always someone somewhere trying to take advange of a good thing for the wrong reason. JB

Doubter: >Tell me again there is nothing unethical or >immoral in the above quote. Talk about >hypocrisy. I'm attempting to find the hypocrisy there Doubter but I haven't yet. Perhaps I missed it, but Row has never written a word on this forum that I have read that would lead me to...

PennyPenny: >Amazing. But I am wondering what was a guy's >annual earnings in 1955 with a similar social status >of a guy who can buy a $900K house today? It's an interesting question Penny. I sure it could be calculated, but I haven't done it. With the home appreciations here stomping...