Search results

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy_suppression It is obvious that "old-money" would oppose free energy. But the reductionist thinking of direct opposition to free energy attempts is just a puny conspiracy theory. However - within systems science and reasoning, there is no denying...

You might find being called a liar insulting, but the fact remains that you started with your ignorance and then fabricated your way along with full intent and claiming insight or foresight. I proved you to be a liar, and I call you a lowly liar because that is how I see a spineless liar...

In my previous post I proved that you are a liar. You had not defined "jonbigism", and not even come up with a complete system of belief/model... you just invented that along as you went. You did this with intent and ignorance. You are just a lowly liar, nothing else.

You said nothing more than "2+2=5" - you defined no context in your first post. Then we later got a name - "jonbigism", and the next few posts we defined a context of "elementary algebra". You are a puny excuse for a "thinking mind", and a liar - changing your story as you go along. :)

Again, this is isomorphic to what I think about reasoning, and the "phase"/"face" that you describe is in the information passing into knowledge - or "your true state of being" as you said. I agree that the teaching of religion has played a role in society and evolution of humankind. The...

1. It was utter bullshit and nonsense 2. I proved it. 3. We(!) changed - not you. You said it was 4 and 5 switching places, and I said it could be done on top of elementary algebra. 4. I explained how that would make it valid - as we had done by defining the context and a coherent, sound...

To I Am: Just to elaborate a little further... Communicating an inner belief is not an act of illegitimacy, but there is certainly a "grey area" as to what role and impact are being used to communicate this belief - without imposing the inner belief and faith on others or things surrounding...

You still don't get it, do you... look at the references that I have been providing you, and I even spelled it out to you in my previous post. Here goes again --- because now I'm understanding that you are in fact "slow" (to put it nicely): "jonbigism" was pure nonsense and if I hadn't told...

I agree on the illegitimacy of oppression/suppression and this illegitimacy/act as being corruption/"sin" of reasoning/"faith". One can use the faith of a "universally absolute" to order the world inside of one, and bring strength and integrity to oneself. But when this faith in a universally...

If I "reordered" every letter in the alphabet to mean something else - a different semantic meaning, and I did not tell you about it... or if I changed the semantic meaning of every word or reference to entities... anything that I wrote or communicated with you would not make any sense to you -...

Well, if the ONLY difference would be 4 and 5 changing semantic meaning in elementary algebra - then it would not be invalid --- AS LONG AS you always qualify your statement with this context. Of course, you did not do this - and that made it just nonsensical as always... :p

Are you saying that evolution (modern evolutionary synthesis) and science with carbon dating and DNA, does not disprove a creating deity?

You can't wash out more substance of a brain washed so thoroughly as stock_trad3r. :)

I showed you how evolution and science using carbon dating and DNA disproves a creating deity for humans and the earth. It is you that keep repeating the question. :p When it comes to the origin of the universe - and the universe as a whole - the question is much more complex.

Well, in my view - I would call it reasoning; but I would also not connect this to an absolute truth, because as you say - belief in absolute truth (or any universally absolute) is in fact "faith". What I also pointed out was how the forced and not voluntary "alignment" of others into such...

Trust Google to rule the world...

Size matters - i.e money management and risk. Be sensible about what triggers and predictions, conditions are the foundations for trades. Position trading is much more difficult, and also need smaller size to offset the risk and larger/no stops.

jonbig04, for you to have a valid statement - it must lie within a system which has some "integrity" and can be used to prove anything - i.e a link between the semantic and syntactic structure towards being a model. If not, you are just playing nonsensical games. That is what model theory...

Sure EURUSD is bull long term, but don't underestimate intervention and relief rally show-boating. Size should reflect the significant risk, so that sane money management is employed to secure a trade. Common sense would say - don't bet on the numbers tomorrow with a trade locking you in right...