Search results

Watch... the FED orchestrate... this message... 1. If Trump interferes... watch out. the economy will be hurt. Per the Kabuki format... 1. First the FED brings out the spokes economists with the bad assumptions... like govt spending will produce inflation. I thought we are all taught the...

i am not sure if you are correct... but that is pretty funny.

nates website is owned by espn. He had to slant to hillary... but if you read between the lines the last week.. he was letting us know trump could win. the left go so pissed at him breaking ranks that they tried to take him down. He called them out as idiots in an almost epic twitter fight...

Overall, almost exactly what I would have written 10 years ago... not bad. He could probably either lose his paycheck or think deeper and actually get it right. Pretty conventional establishment analysis. I used to believe the same econ propaganda. Til I dug deeper. Here is the big one...

why? you are suggesting that if I do the research I might find something interesting.. instead of doing the research yourself. While researching I suggest you pull open an econ 101 textbook and turn to the section on the the fungibility of the dollar.

irrelevant to the point I have been making.

we are talking about systems and demand curves across the economy. besides... tax rates of 100% prove the point. No one would deliver service at 100% unless coerced. So 100% tax would be far worse for the govt than 10%. As keynes said there are tax rates which defeat the purpose of trying...

its not lawyering its science. its the absence of evidence that is your team's issue. you have zero peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing warming. Plus, we have science showing co2 levels trail change in ocean temps. When you try to argue the lagging variable (co2 trails...

I suggest that the nuclear clock get pushed back. Hillary and Obama only have a few days to keep brainlessly provoking a nuclear power like Russia in the middle east. Luckily Putin had the good will to call Trump. Things are already looking better...

That is the crux of the issue. You can't just make that assumption. you have not shown that on net adding man made co2 is causing warming. 1. at some point adding more gas may not keep you any warmer but it does block warming rays. we have shown you science which indicates that adding more...

Ricter, your response is again a non sequitor. I am not citing to the slayers or their opinion. I am citing to the NASA scientists directly. read this.... from your quote... I can't believe you are remaining so ignorant on this subject. "Yes, of course the upper atmosphere is going to...

you two think co2 only discriminates in one direction... its preposterously ignorant. Really why don't you 2 wise up and read this... again and again until you understand it. from the NASA link above... (I will bold the words for you like you all were in science 101)...

I predict that tax cuts will stimulate the economy and real jobs with good pay will grow over time absent and exogenous shock. Inflation levels will be in large part dependent on how much electronic money the FED creates independent of the U.S. deficit.

it sure seems that way.

while we wait for piezoe to explain why he is against cutting taxes if it is followed by an increase in revenue.... I want to address the point ricter seems to be making... Piezoe's argument is so basic its irrelevant. You borrow a million and give to people... they will spend it. Some...

How many times do I have to tell that that Co2 is by definition a greenhouse gas and then tell you that.... Now the following is not spin or a lawyers trick... its science... If you understand how co2 works... you will of course see that co2 would also cool. Greenhouse gases can both warm...

very interesting. I agree the anchor baby citizenship program must stop. For the americans that already benefited from it. Great. You are as american as anyone. But it should cease to apply to babies born in 2017 and beyond. I think my wife is an anchor baby. Her parents were here as...

only a stalinist would argue with the idea of cutting taxes if the cuts result in increased revenue. think about how insane you must be to argue against it. why would you want to take away money from the people who earned it. if you were not a party loving (banker loving) stalinist...

wow... if that is real could the correlation be any higher. that is really messed up.

tony... we did not believe your statements then and we do not believe them now. you are not really trying to pretend you were talking about the popular vote over the election winner... are you? Don't embarrass yourself now with that deceit. Just accept the fact as many of you leftist friends...