Search results

......teaching how not to understand.

Seriously? That's fancy. Hell of an excuse for the no big deal that you happened to contradict yourself. Let's not get carried away here!! Mathematics of the Universe is math. Meta-mathematics is studying math itself - using math. Meta-thinking is metacognition which is thinking about...

Then what would it mean to you for something to be a Designer? I am taking it that we both know what's being meant by the word Designer here. Why would I be astonished? What does astonish me more, is how you talk of cells as if they are nothing of consequence. Something that is remarkable...

It really isn't that difficult a question to answer, you simply missed my point. As one of those who apparently wants or believes or prefers there to be a 'Designer', and you say all physical laws are ALWAYS mathematical, how come you don't believe math is your 'Designer'? It's a fair question...

So why if they are always mathematical, would that not just mean that Math was the 'Designer'? Physical laws are the observed inherent characteristics of a thing, what ever that thing is; space or time or matter. Everything has its inherent characteristics. If it did not, it would be something...

...you throw some shit ...and ask for no shit throwing. I'm thinking... ass hole... theory also. You first. You're the one who keeps trolling Penrose. Is that big odds number speculation or fact? ....'cause if it's speculation, wtf kind of kicking yourself would ever be sufficient for...

I'm thinking......white holes, in accordance with gravitational field equations of general relativity :)

Who said I was supporting it? What I am doing is not supporting your angry name calling and the ill considered, serious lack of rational thought you portray all the time. That so called Probability you keep trolling out is speculation. That's where the zero integrity is. It started right there...

Why so angry all the time. I have never discounted a Tuner; Gravity is a very fine Tuner indeed! God, the impossible lucky universe fairy. Now you're onto something there.

suggest: Cosmological natural selection. Go educate yourself.

All it would need are more attempts than 10^10^123 to make that no zeros, to put the odds at 1:1. Cosmologists support that so called probability also. Or even like some lottery winners, achieve a win on the first attempt.

Believing something because you doubt it, sounds more like someone with an IQ similar to their hat size . Apart from absurd, that's also known as blind faith. Talk about juvenile arguments.

Quite so. Science being proof without certainty. Religion being certainty without proof. Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. Voltaire

Great! ....but only one connection ever provides a practical understanding in reality to learn and discover knowledge of how the physical universe works..... science.

Already reviewed. ..where the gap is a lack of knowledge. You put God in a same equivalency with randomness. Then again, not thinking these things through is what you do. Restricting your options to random to avoid inevitable is something you might review.

Einstein has already said he doesn't believe in a personal God. Einstein portrays that human thinking has an emotional foundation and considers that's what the word religion means to him.

The context is perfectly clear to anyone who unlike yourself is not so angry and aggressive about their fixed religious beliefs they can't read properly. I had already made the point in clear terms, Beyond comprehension sits God of lightning. ....obviously you need that context spelt out; so...

Pretense has any number of higher powers. Reality ultimately one; the universe. "For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." Carl Sagan.

Many non-religionists have created those things also. They are possible and they happen where religious belief is not involved. Most cultures don't follow religious dogmas within them anyway. They come about despite religion, not because of it. The human spirit is not a specific property of...

I'd say truth is quite simply a fact that has been verified.