Search results

lol.

God.. lol.

"Burning a black church in Mississippi, there is a meaning and a context to that," said Blair Reeves, 35, who set up the GoFundMe.com page. ...donors have come from supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, supporters of Republican candidate Donald Trump and people around...

Please get a clue.

... what's good for the goose. I don't have the will as your leader to guide your trolling any longer but stuff will resolve itself anyhow and the truth is always out there, but you will at least have the comfort of knowing you'll still be a dick head when everything has played out.

So that's good. Your first step is to admit are a troll, following a leader. But if you can't follow the logic, you should just stop posting. There's nothing that says the apprehended alleged perpetrator was a Dump Trump or Clinton supporter. In fact the Commissioner /fire marshal says they do...

I'll lead then. You follow.

Stop trolling

Thanks seeing how you've had no luck in making your own twist look anything other than completely fake.

No it isn't. It is "obviously" to any reasonable person, an angry black guy who wanted Trump to win while his fellow congregationalists don't. That is every bit as likely as your interpretation.

....but you can't in this case and neither has anyone else, which is the point!

Maybe. But there are plenty of Trump supporters idiot enough to paint the words "Vote Trump" on the side of a burned black church. There are also clearly idiots enough to link news reports to imply Clinton or No To Trump supporters may have written it, when those news links do no such thing...

"We do not believe it was politically motivated. There may have been some efforts to make it appear politically motivated," Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney, who is also the fire marshal, told AP. So how come y'all still so desperate to produce fake information. Don't tell me...

... the rest being somewhat academic :rolleyes:

No scientific paper on any scientific subject explicitly states something exists beyond all doubt. You should first understand how science works. Science is proof without certainty. The fundamental basic scientific principles that support AGW have not been made false by any other scientific...

1350 plus skeptical papers If AGW were wrong, one would have been enough.

Politicians, businessmen, engineers, and scores of self-proclaimed researchers also raised strong objections, made controversial comments and produced many absurd reasons against Einstein's Relativity, and it's just the same with AGW. But none of it has changed or made false the fundamental...

Water vapor concentrations in the air are controlled by Earth’s temperature. Warmer temperatures evaporate more water from the oceans, expand air masses, and lead to higher humidity. Cooling causes water vapor to condense and fall out as rain, sleet, or snow. Carbon dioxide, on the other hand...

fake news fake words fake denial the evolution of a gw refusenik 2012 it's a Chinese hoax” 2016 “I have an open mind to it on human activity... "I think there is some connectivity. There is some, something.” Darn the pesky science.