Search results

ART, Get help

oops...You missed, misinterpretation yet again. Your lack of a sense of humor is showing !! Cover it up. It's ugly. ps. would you like me to explain the tease for you?? :p

No. Hubris is part of your problem. more of it wont help you. Get some proper professional help.

ART, Get help

You have been slated by Axeman and others in every God thread I've read. Axeman correctly pointed out to you, time after time, your habit of raising strawman argument. All you are now doing here is asking me to create my own straw man for you. It is not reasonable inquiry to ask someone...

nononsense, My response to jem was measured and reasonable. Was it not? But you chose to indulge in phrases such as these in regard to a post which was not addressed to you in the first place and then you say it was not aggressive! Trying to piss together some credibility again? [read stu...

nonsense. Why the aggressive response to a post I made to someone else?? What’s your problem? In case you hadn't noticed I was talking to jem not you. Your attempt at argument is appearing INCOHERENT, as already pointed out to you by Virtuoso. Your sense of humor appears neither...

Would that be intended to establish a credibility which might otherwise not be present? If they were able to choose “naive and happy” and to “live forever” why would they “choose to live outside of the protection, with knowledge of good and evil.” ? If it was ‘bad’ for them...

ok , you're a tosser ?

please fuck off, is flaming? A rather direct but polite request is all that is, surely. As for rational..., irrational is spouting off ridiculous nonsense within a ridiculous desire to defend the indefensible. Religion is irrational. And as ..."rationality is a matter of choice" I choose...

You pissed away any credibility in the PoC thread and still pissing in here. You're getting more & more weird each time nononsense, Please fuck off. Thanks in advance. :) luv stu

No way getting mixed up, Snow White actually happened, it's true everyone knows that! But my Invisible Friend Gilbert told me about religionists like yourself who have no explanation to offer , except the usual variety of empty threats, foreboding, portend, lots of weirdness and truck loads...

But the 'Word of God' says "..for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." What's up with that? The obvious...Adam atest thereof - and you say he didn't die. Then apparently this God gets stuff badly wrong.... But that was not what I was referring to. The Genesis...

Follow the Word of God No need to follow the Word of God. Nope try again..follow the Word of God No it isn't free choice. If you read The Word of God precisely , as it is written, there was no choice given in the Genesis fable. Adam did not have freewill.

Exactly so Rearden and in addition, you must also make assumptions at their order, just so they can have it that you make assumptions. Of course by the same perverted logic of the theist, 'Faith' is not an assumption, but logic is. But only when they want it to be.

If you are genuinely interested in debate then why fan sparks into flames? I showed how you misinterpreted my my response.. shall I go through it for you.... You first make MY premise for me... if that isn't at least running the risk of gross misinterpretation what is?? It turned out to...

You are (as usual) misinterpreting my response. Why would I provide a first assumption? Why do you require an assumption rather than to define what constitutes proof. Is it because your method of argument relies eventually upon accusing me of making an assumption in place of dealing with...

Just why do I need to provide an assumption? Then before defining what existence is (or is not), you might do better to first define what constitutes proof. If believing were proof that something exists, then anything exists . Under such circumstances, anything has the same value or meaning...

Well thanks a bunch for deciding what my basic and essential premise is. It seems you prefer to define my essential premise for me, rather than ask me what it might be. I said that nowhere in my post to Malestrom. It appears you have decided what my premise is by saying something which I never...

Many if not most christians would disagree with you. Jesus is supposed to have proven God's existence. Bearing witness (whatever that is supposed to mean) to jesus is usually absolute proof - to those who call themselves genuinely christian - that God exists. Many christians would say you are...