Search results

Not as an established fact, but as someone who self professes 3 degrees in science/engineering, you are saying that in itself along with being christian, is some sort of confirmation that Max Planck meant something opposite to what he did actually say. Logic like that would not earn you 3...

Quote from stu: Q. .....then would I be correct in understanding, you do not have faith in God as a fact? Quote from volente: A. I have faith that there is a creator/ designer / something more out there. Do I have proof of existence ? No. Do you have proof that everywhere...

Quote from volente: Suppose one day an entity shows up on earth and claims to be God. What scientific tests will you administer to disprove it's claim ? Quote from stu: "I can propose a very clear and simple test, based on fact and the scientific method which would convince enough to...

The record shows the last thing you came with was an open mind. Arguments based on facts and proof , when no facts or proof are of interest to you. Right. Were agnostic ... "The only right choice through logical reasoning"... how come you failed so miserably to make any logical reasoning...

erm DerekD would you please call security.

.....then would I be correct in understanding, you do not have faith in God as a fact?

I can post my test. You've demonstrated perfectly well that you can't grasp any understanding of what it is. You really will need to do that first off.

You've offered not one piece of rational information or counter evidence to alter the obvious mistake you've made, after cutting & pasting Max Planck’s words. You have no clue, or would have realized ,it backfired in your face. By what you showed Planck said himself, he would not...

Hold it right there volente, you said it all at that point!! So indeed, belief nor faith is requisite.

I hadn't realized Gilbert has had such a resounding and recurring effect on your thinking Iam. Your philosophy, up to here, though luverly as a hippy's is , unsurprisingly is flawed. By your explanations you say Love cannot be limited. Then it is wanting of something that it cannot be...

Compared to expectations and predictions for atoms and nuclear power ......you would be very greatly disillusioned. My test is an honest one, but you can't even understand it past "gibberish". That says a lot by itself. Are you really that lost for words and ideas, just like your link...

Why all the vitriol? Why are you so angry? All that emotion!! Is it the Christian in you? Take a pill dude. Look. You did the cut & paste, not me. I simply highlighted the part which suggests Max Planck would by his own words which, I repeat, you cut and pasted, have walked away from - on...

Praise indeed from the Master Troll Slayer, who single handedly presented King Troll It's head , ass and other flappy bits on a golden platter. I thank you very kindly sir.

Not at all sure I am Jesus should do that Derek. People have called me a cult before now and they didn't sound particularly pleased. At least I think it was cult.

Faith is not requisite. X therefore Y should be the case.... is not faith. It's expectation. Fusion therefore nuclear energy... is anticipation not faith. I know this therefore I predict this...is not faith. This exists, that exists therefore the atom should exist, is not faith it...

Thanks for the explanation. The assumed to be perfect circle is found to be relying on an irrational number as you say. You agreed perfection is a relative term. Then you say - perfect circle - to suggest perfection is not a relative term. Which is it? Why would that relative term and...

Then it is more likely Max Planck would have walked away from his God and from faith, rather than give up his science. This is something you could not possibly begin to understand.

You want me to explain a simple test, but you can't even understand my simple statement as being anything but gibberish. When you can , let me know. Perhaps your first question should be, why would you even want to ? You're drifting again. Maybe a recap. I stated... "I can...

How strange it is then that he was awarded the Nobel prize for work in physics based on the science of fundamental physical constants and not for having faith.