Search results

Then the same goes for Slavery , you would have to by the same token, call the Court activist where it reversed 175 years of that prior practice by a ruling under the Thirteenth Amendment. Your argument is redundant. It either is or it is not unconstitutional to act contrary to the...

Bullshit. By finding religious tests unconstitutional in the First Amendment there is no explicit avoidance of Article VI Even the most thick headed religious zealots it seems are not unintelligent enough to press the Supreme Court for a state test , as it is the wording of Article...

Lol what a joke. You, ... a lawyer ?... don't make me laugh. Your absurd argument that Supreme Courts make rulings by personal preference - and there is an interpretation of yes for the word no - is worse than pathetic. At least AAA had the good grace to retire from the constitutional...

Good grief, you really are that slow. Perhaps try looking at it this way. Through your need to be led by the nose, finding support in being told what to do , adhering to instructions routed through superstition, irrational beliefs, ignorance and fear , that might be the only context...

.....that's a very interesting -self projection onto others- thing you have going there. It's not that you have a typing problem , I would say you display all the properties of having an integrity and character problem. It's inconceivable the excuses you gave, would possibly be cause for...

.."does what makes state constitutions - unconstitutional back to the constitutional convention? " First try communicating in English. Then perhaps you can be shown where you are not grasping even the simplest of concepts. Language , legal or otherwise. "It is up to your to prove that a...

You don't know what I've got jem boy. It is however perfectly clear that no lawyer fit to be called lawyer, or worth their salt for that matter, would go through law school spelling cite as site. I'll take no lessons on jurisprudence from someone that gaumless. So you think that any act or...

Possibly because I would do a personal integrity check first , having an unwavering belief in an evil act being a good act, is simply something which does not appeal to me. The God or Father, concept or whatever you want to call the thing ,does give me a handle on what something...

Thanks for getting back on this but there is no way any rational understanding suggests that is an act of love. This Father you mention requires humanity to ritually kill His only Son. That is not an act of love. He requires humanity to carry out that inhumane act only because He wants to...

Seriously, is that response supposed to be some sort of an analogy? It has little if anything to do with a ritual killer making promises of eternal life as if that was in some way being 'saved', only to allow the killer himself to be worshipped. It only takes a little thought to notice...

Right, so this Father sent his only Son to die for the reason that the Father would promise this eternal life idea. So we have a narcissistical egocentric ritual Son killer requiring people to kill his Son for him, so that he would allow them to "live" forever to worship what would by now...

... mind boggling incoherence. Bad even by your standards Religious tests are unconstitutional . Against that the most intelligent response you can manage is: Things like a religious test are Constitutional when the U.S. is tied to them. Just because they are found unconstitutional...

In both religion and trading, without proof it would be wiser to keep out than have to get out.

congratulations , spoken like a true moron. Fact I stated that was Unconstitutional and only a bigot would find it laudable to have a deeply ingrained christianity which required a religious test to hold office . Another Fact. You couldn't even spell cite when you came to this board. Nor could...

The confusion is all yours. You cannot say Article VI does not apply to states for any judicial reason. That is made clear by the Supreme Court ruling YOU posted. Only by a twist that the Constitution reference to United States does not mean states - do you rely on that ridiculous position...

Too f*kd up with christianity are you to discuss the facts jem. Anyone can see that.

How very Islamic.

....and unconstitutional. (Not to mention un American.) In your case jem it's mind closed.

The Constitution , the single most important legal documant, is the grounding for The Law of the United States - the supreme law of the land. I feel sure you are aware state courts are bound by the supreme law. State offices too. No amount of fundemntalist Christian idealogue is going to...

ok, but please don't waste too much of your time on my account trying to show how " ..all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states " - does not include state offices -