Search results

I don't believe you care about the truth. Nothing you write gives the impression you care about the truth. You're happy to side with any cut & past un-constitutional misinterpretation edited out of context technically incorrect rendition, which supports your own religious bigotry and ideas...

how would you know, your not a true Christian. ( BTW Jesus is watching you tell lies about God's Court)

It's true. America is no longer a Christian nation because of those God damned Bill of Rights. Things started going down the kazoo once the Puritans, who let's face it are the only true Christians worthy of the name , gave way to evil Founding secular freedom - liberty stuff and crap...

A dissertation is supposed to forward original or new viewpoints resulting from research. "What is it all about, we may never know"..... isn’t the type of treatise which one should expect to win an advanced academic degree with or turn someone into a "good scientist" It will however no...

...like a glove on a foot.

Yeah I know what you mean.... kinda like there're no theists in abortion clinics.

jem, you are not helping yourself by repeating this over and over. Each time you do it's only showing how ignorant you are . You cut&pasted Trinity as example of a case which is supposed to be relevant. Probably you've learned to do this in default when anything legal is mentioned with the...

dude there is life outside ET :) I didn't expect you'd be interested. I still don't, so won't waste too much of my time or yours at this stage. Keeping on topic to some extent...... Gov Sarah Palin would no doubt promote creationism equal to science in school given half the chance. She...

You seem keen to tell others what they believe, but you're the one with the beliefs. Therefore let me put it this way, when someone doesn't have something, it doesn't mean they have something else. If someone doesn't believe, that doesn't mean they have belief. I would say that really should...

Would you please explain how you are using the verb to Condone Is it not in the accepted way to: Excuse, overlook, or make allowances for; be lenient with..as in Judaism and Christianity, where in the same place it addresses your inner world of " Love thy neighbor as thyself " via the...

Justice Brewer could have commented on the Koran if he'd wanted to. In fact he did make disparaging remarks during his opinion in Trinity against Mulims which proves the point. But it is not law. Those comments by the Court (Justice Brewer) do not have any bearing to the specific rule of law...

So you don't know if the U.S. Constitution can make a case ? You can't say if the words " no test ... ever " in the U.S. Constitution make too narrow a definition to make a case??? Really ??... .....you've still not thought this through yet, have you..... dipshit. Ok, so you're...

That's odd. You infer there is evidence for "something that we know nothing about". Then you imply there can't be any evidence against "something that we know nothing about". Is that what you meant about how you intend to go around in circles.

I would no more believe there is no God than I would believe there is no Odin or spaghetti monster or fairies. They are all equally superfluous or irrelevant things , not serious enough to justify holding any belief for or against. For you to suggest lack of belief is belief , is frankly...

No, not at all. Scientists know what they are looking for or more precisely what they are not looking for with the Hadron collider and are going about the process of finding proof of it. It sounds as if you don't want to know what God is because if you did , there would be no God? Is that...

That inevitably IS "first cause". DNA mutation is evidence for the cause of evolution. So your next question is a "first cause" one ... right?...what caused DNA. You are telling me I have no evidence against a supernatural being? I do have evidence which I think quite compelling. Are you...

You seem quite clear on what God is not. Do you have any ideas on what It is? Can God have any more substantiation than just being imagined ? Because if not it is nothing to do with scientific discovery. Scientific discovery is the only method which brings imagination into provable reality.

Perhaps it is the over aggressive tone you've adopted which belies your real point. I think it is confusing the issue both for yourself and others. You are simply talking of first cause. That's a completely different matter altogether to what your earlier argument says - as shown above...

Then you would be wrong to do so. The DNA of an organism mutates. vhehn has already provided information how science and Francis S. Collins director of the Human Genome Project have now provided incontrovertible proof of a long understood evolutionary fact . You are wrong to say there is...

What you suspect, is obviously extremely suspect. But you’re getting there sparky. " The Supreme Court did not use unconstitutional religious tests as evidence." 1. Correct. woo. ".... because the tests were not unconstitutional as evidence when the Supreme Court cited them as...