Search results

A great post for new recruits, Grob. :cool:

Thanks Spider for the feedback. Your this post associated with the trade sheet provides me a clearer view about Jack's trading (unique) style. I hope you can fulfil your trading gaols with great satisfaction and success, just like Jack do/ did. Cheers :)

I know. But I also know I don't know everything you know. :confused:

May I say there are two issues: Trends exist, and Make (good) profits by trading trends. It's like volcanoes exist and we may love the scene very much for a closer look. However, we won't jump into one without proper equipments, because we also know it's dangerous. :confused:

If your trading method after learning from Jack for years represents a typital example of Jack's complete method, I just don't understand why none of you the capable students would not write up something clear and concise systematically, that would perfect the method to some degree, I believe...

After 5 years trading with real money, now you must be very surprising to find out at least one learner can make it works, finally. :D

Most if not all are experiments. Are you really studying Jack's method like others of his followers do? Couldn't believe it. Otherwise, how do you know his method doesn't work? Probably the whole game would be if you tell a very large number of people something as ambiguous as possible...

Sorry, I meant (pseudo-)white. Type too fast. :confused:

That means if we cannot fight against them, then better join/ folllow them. :D

Exactly yes, if that's the case!

Why don't we trade only the most active stocks of the day within NASDAQ100? No any complicate indicators/ no lines/ no whatsoever/ no anything? Do you think this works, to some degree? :confused:

Can you remember how many times were yours? :confused:

Have you got any pointers or ideas trading only the component stocks of Nasdaq100, mainly based on volume and price (anything else)? You know I'm not able to decipher Jack's or Spider's holy grail yet at this age, probably never will. :mad: Looks like Jack offers a white box, but Spider...

Looks like you're once an expert in fully automated/ mechanical/ mathematical/ systematic/ quantitative systems, and you also know much better than all others who are managing hundreds of million dollars funds, so that making the above assertion easily without hesitations. :confused:

Based on my calculation for the 6 months having a win-rate over 80% and return per month about 6% based on $50,000 equity, I have to say the performance so far has been impressive. Do you think your method and its performance could still make profits consistently regardless of any overall...

Thanks Johnny. Looks like a good system. A 30% yearly would be very good if consistently profitable every year now and in the future. Jones book has a % time in dd for reference. :)

Thanks Spider. Sorry for I haven't got the right software to read .xls file for the moment. Anyway, do you have any very simple summaries (even just one figure say return on equity each year) for: - Apr02-Mar03 (say 100% return, probably simulation), - Apr03-Mar04 (say 150% return...

Thanks Spyder. How long you have been using and trading this journal's method? Do you have any statistics so far for us to learn? :confused:

Hypo, How, by what terms, do you find the top 10 NAZ? :confused:

Me too. :)